Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02603-08
Original file (02603-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG

Docket No: 2603-08
9 July 2008

 

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
08. Your allegations of error and

your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

and policies.

reason of the dereliction of duty charge and alcohol
rehabilitation failure. Subsequently, the commanding officer
recommended a general discharge. However, after review, the

included. In connection with this processing, you elected to
waive the right to have your case heard by an administrative
discharge. However, your commanding officer again recommended a

general discharge. After review, the discharge authority

determined that with

included, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was

appropriate. However,
discharge. You were discharged under other than honorable
conditions on 21 April 1987.

potentially mitigating factors, such as your unsupported
contentions that you became addicted to alcohol while in the Navy
and that you have since overcome your alcoholism and are a
productive citizen. The Board found that these factors and
contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of

your discharge given your record of misconduct. The Uniform Code
of Military Justice classifies a period of unauthorized absence

Further, the Board believed that sometime during the 31 day
period of absence, you had to have made a knowing decision not to
return to duty. The Board concluded that the discharge was
proper as issued and no change is warranted.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

 

Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03546-08

    Original file (03546-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material “error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09510-08

    Original file (09510-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 30 March 1992 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, drug abuse,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04765-01

    Original file (04765-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06873-08

    Original file (06873-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 January 1983, the discharge authority directed a type warranted by service record discharge due to your alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07180-08

    Original file (07180-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An administrative discharge board met on 25 September 1992 and found that you should be discharged due to a pattern of misconduct with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06259-01

    Original file (06259-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In and your unauthorized absences this regard, individuals discharged by reason of misconduct often receive other than honorable discharges. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03581-08

    Original file (03581-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval urden is on the applicant to demonstrate the probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02576-08

    Original file (02576-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Further, the Board believed that you were fortunate to have received a general discharge since a discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05980-08

    Original file (05980-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 June 1978, you requested an OTH discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the 298 day period of UA.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07239-08

    Original file (07239-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 8 April 1983, you were counseled regarding your unsatisfactory performance and conduct, advised that the command would assist you with alcohol...