Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03546-08
Original file (03546-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ~
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 26370-51600

 

CRS
Docket No: 3546-08
12 May 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 May 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
“error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 23 May
i978. You received two nonjudicial punishments and were
convicted by a summary court-martial for offenses that included
unauthorized absences, failure to obey a lawful order, violation
of a lawful general order, possession of a bayonet in locker,
possession of alcohol in the barracks, willful disobedience of a
lawful order, Gisrespect, possession of marijuana, and
communication of a threat.’

On 29 May 1981 your commanding officer recommended that you be
separated from the Marine Corps with a discharge under other than
honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to frequent
involvement of a discreditable nature with military authorities.
The recommendation was approved by the separation authority, and
you were separated with a discharge under other than honorable
conditions on 25 June 1981. .

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
service, and the contention that bipolar disorder caused your
Misconduct. .The Board concluded that those factors were
insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
‘given your extensive disciplinary action, and the absence of
credible evidence that shows you suffered from bipolar disorder
while in the Marine Corps. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel

will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case areé such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitied to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. SALMAN

Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03829-08

    Original file (03829-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR583 14

    Original file (NR583 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08827-05

    Original file (08827-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered a letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) dated 21 March 1983, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07119-99

    Original file (07119-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on your conviction by Japanese authorities you were processed for an administrative discharge. The psychiatric diagnoses are Bipolar Disorder, You contend that your deprived background The and drug and alcohol abuse impaired your The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your conviction by Japanese authorities of a serious offense. The Board considered the psychiatric evaluation you showing that you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09871-10

    Original file (09871-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08769-05

    Original file (08769-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5751 14

    Original file (NR5751 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09779-08

    Original file (09779-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01190-08

    Original file (01190-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05330-07

    Original file (05330-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 23 August 1977 to 19...