Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01794-08
Original file (01794-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG

Docket No: 1794-08
14 November 2008

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 4

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
Navy Reservist, filed an application with this Board requesting
that his release from active duty be changed from 2 to 5
September 1994.

2. The Board, consisting of Mrs oe Mc .~Neand Ms.

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 15 October 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
_available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that Petitioner's application was
not filed in a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to
waive the statute of limitations and consider the application on
its merits.

Cc. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy for 4 years on 6
September 1990 and was released from active duty on 2 September
1994, Therefore, he was credited with 3 years, 11 months and 27
days of active service. Regulations in effect at the time and in
effect now allow for early separation or discharge if the
_ enlistment expires on a weekend or a holiday. Therefore,
Petitioner has been treated no differently than thousands of
others.
d. Petitioner was serving in the Regular Navy and was

released from active duty and transferred to the Navy Reserve to
complete the remainder of his military obligation. Regulations
then in effect required that the beginning date of his reserve
anniversary year be established as the first day in the reserve
component. Since 3 September 1994, he has accumulated 13 years
of qualifying service in the reserve component and is serving as
a commissioned officer. Therefore, at the end of his anniversary
year on 2 September 2008 he has been credited with 3 years, 11
months and 27 days of service in the Navy and 13 years

in the Navy Reserve or 16 years, 11 months and 27 days.

e. Petitioner apparently believes that because of his early
release from active duty he will have to serve another full year
in the Navy Reserve to qualify for retirement. However, partial
qualifying years can be credited if a discharge or retirement
occurs during the anniversary year and sufficient points are
earned to make that partial year qualifying.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. Although the Board was aware that Petitioner has been
treated no differently than thousands of others, the Board
believes that given his record of excellent service that an
exception should be made in this case. Accordingly, the Board
concludes that his record should be corrected to show that he was
released from active duty on 5 September 1994 vice the release
date of 2 September 1994 now of record.

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand the reasons for the change in the
length of his service.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
was released from active duty on 5 September 1994 vice the
release date of 2 September 1994 now of record.

b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.
Gowen \\ Rog
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J.* GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03595-07

    Original file (03595-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner a former commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 vice the discharge with separation pay now of record. Instead of recommending Petitioner for an early retirement, his unit recommended him for Reserve Involuntary Separation Pay, based on 14 years of qualifying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00434-01

    Original file (00434-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner states that he attempted to reenlist in the anniversary year ending 29 If those five f. Concerning his request to transfer to the Retired Reserve, the Board is aware that the Navy Personnel routinely recommended corrective action in those cases where an individual was qualified for reserve retirement and there is no explanation in the record why an individual was discharged and not retired. clearly his intent to qualify for retirement, the Board concludes that one retirement...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02525-09

    Original file (02525-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), ‘Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 24 April 2004. If this had been in effect at the time of Petitioner's service he would have had 20 years of qualifying service. Since he would have 20 years of qualifying under current regulations, the Board concludes that his record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08098-08

    Original file (08098-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 8098-08 4 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj EVIEW OF NAVAL RI Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05701-02

    Original file (05701-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show reinstatement in the Naval Reserve so that he can qualify for reserve retirement. He earned no further qualifying years and was honorably discharged on 31 August 2000. d. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Director, Naval Reserve Administration Division, Navy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10069-08

    Original file (10069-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 10069-08 19 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF «gigi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. At the end of his anniversary year on 18 April 2001 he was only credited with 42 of the 50 retirement points necessary for another qualifying year. Although Petitioner requested that the transfer to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05777-05

    Original file (05777-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged.2. Given the circumstances, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s record should be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve.Concerning the issue of his grade on retirement, the Board believes that Petitioner may...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07154-09

    Original file (07154-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 07154-09 °30 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF g Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to. However, the Board is aware that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07154-09

    Original file (07154-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 07154-09 °30 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF g Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to. However, the Board is aware that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01191-08

    Original file (01191-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his retirement point record be corrected to show a complete anniversary year vice the partial anniversary year now of record. He then had to request broken service reenlistment and was not able to reenlist until 3 January 2006. d. Petitioner's discharge on 2 July 2005 was prior to the completion of his anniversary year on 13 September 2005. ...