|
| |
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION F NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 312-08
24, Nov 08
Dear
This is in reference to your applicatiion for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of (10 USC 1552.
|
A three-member panel of the Boa i for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, schaia red your application on 24
November 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and |policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser
N130D/08U0895 of 14 Nov 08, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinian. The Board found that you received
a substantial monetary bonus for you reenlistment in 2006 (for a 6
year term). However, you were discharged in March 2007 after serving
only about eleven months of the jsix year term. vader such
circumstances, the Board finds no erior or injusti¢e in the recoupment
of the unearned portion of the Honus |received. Ac¢ordingly, your
application, and your request for a personal appearance before the
Board, have been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request |
: |
Tt is regretted that the circumgtances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon suljmission of new and|material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
| Docket No. 312-08
In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to| all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
| |
|
|
, Sincerely, N
|W. DEAN PFEKRF
| Executive Di
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08224-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01609-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 31 December 1998, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3292 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5861 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 28 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR5861-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9649 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NR09649-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5549 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO5549-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5153 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8246 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-312 dated 17 January 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8534 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of ip @ 2 copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2812-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1000 PERS-312/06 dtd 13 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire | record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.