Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00078-08
Original file (00078-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

SIN
Docket No: 00078-08
11 December 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW _OF NAVAL OF RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code.

2. The Board, consisting of ee and

Mr. “MR. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 9 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of
active duty on 22 July 1996 at age 19. Although the record
reflects that he failed the physical fitness assessment (PFA)
test on four occasions, he was advanced to petty officer second

class, his evaluations reflect generally excellent performance,
and he received three Good Conduct Medals.

d. On 9 March 2006, Petitioner signed an enlisted
performance evaluation for the period 16 March 2004 to 15 March
2005 in which he was not recommended for advancement or
retention. That evaluation assigned adverse marks in the
category of military bearing, but satisfactory marks in all other
categories. The evaluation also notes that he failed four PFA's
in a four year period and had been compliant with the command’ s

Fitness Enhancement Program.

e. On 8 September 2006, Petitioner was honorably discharged
from active duty. At that time he was assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.

f. With his application, Petitioner states that the
reenlistment code assigned by his command was only because of his
PFA failures. In this regard, he could have been assigned a code
of RE-3F, meaning that he repeatedly failed the PFA.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action based on Petitioner's overall record of military service,
including over 10 years of service with no disciplinary
infractions. Further, he was advanced in rate to second class
petty officer, and received three Good Conduct Medals. The Board
therefore concludes that no useful purpose is served by
assignment of the most restrictive reenlistment code of RE-4, and
assignment of the RE-3F code more accurately reflects the quality
of his service.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 8 September 2006, Petitioner was issued a RE-3F reenlistment
code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code actually issued on that
date.

b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

c. That upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner’s application was received on
31 December 2007.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN \ GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e) )
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

lo Words
W. DEAN P Fr
Executive Dikactto

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00925-06

    Original file (00925-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2. The Board, consisting of Mr.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations o error and injustice on 2 May 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Assignment of a reenlistment code of RE-3F would mean that he failed the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00502-11

    Original file (00502-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 00502-11 18 Octeber 2011 -From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (Qi: Ref: (a) 100.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention} reentry code. That...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09103-07

    Original file (09103-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 09103-07 21 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF aq See Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06987-08

    Original file (06987-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2NAVY ANNEX ~ WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 06987-08 22 May 2009 © From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD ICO rae Ref: (a} 100.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. The evaluation also noted that he failed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11839-09

    Original file (11839-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJN Docket No: 11839-09 30 August 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 16 U:S.¢., 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11879-08

    Original file (11879-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 11879-08 28 October 20039 From: Chairman, .Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF MAVAL RECORD OF (U0 Ref: (a) 10 U.§.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) wath...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07180-05

    Original file (07180-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marines Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr and Mr reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The reenlistment code of RE-4 means that Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04321-09

    Original file (04321-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 04321-09 29 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iil Ref: (a) 10 0.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. d. With his application, Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08203-08

    Original file (08203-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 . SIN Docket No: 08203-08 10 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD or eee Ref: (a) 10 0.8.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3} Subject's naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03798-07

    Original file (03798-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51300 SIN Docket No: 03798-07 4 February 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in her RE-4 reenlistment code. 2 BRC RES, Consisting of i. MRE =...