DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket
No: 11325-07
25 November 2008
This is in reference to your application for correc¢
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of
Records, sitting in executive session, considered
application on 13 November 2008. Your allegations
injustice were reviewed in accordance with adminis
regulations and procedures applicable to the proce
Board. Documentary material considered by the Boa
your application, together with all material submi
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of t
record, the Board found that the evidence submitte
insufficient to establish the existence of probabl
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Co
January 1997. On 1 October 1999 a medical evaluat
diagnosed you with right ankle pain and directed 1
Six months. You were returned to full duty on 16
were released from active duty and transferred to
Corps Reserve on 22 January 2001. Your service wa
as “under honorable conditions”, and you were assi
code of RE-4, which indicates that you were not el
recommended for reenlistment. Although your record
it appears that you were the subject of disciplina
during November 2000, as you were released from ac
private with a date of rank 13 November 2000. You
honorable discharge certificate on 16 January 2005,
expiration of your statutory service obligation.
The Board concluded that your receipt of an honor al
certificate on 16 January 2005 is insufficient to
recharacterizing your active duty service as fully
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
{t is regretted that the circumstances of your cased
tion of your
of the United
Naval
our
of error and
rative
dings of this
d consisted of
ted in support
regulations
e entire
was
material
ps on 23
on board
mited duty for
une 2000. You
he Marine
characterized
ned a reentry
gible or
is incomplete,
y action
ive duty as a
ere issued an
upon the
le discharge
arrant
honorable.
names and
upon request.
are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered |by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstr
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
records.
official naval
ate the
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12000-08
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 22 January 2009 and 26 February 2009 with enclosures, copies of which are attached. In this regard, the Board noted that the favorable advisory opinion dated 22 January 2009 did not acknowledge the information reflected in enclosures (2), (3), (4) and (9) of the advisory opinion dated 26 February 2009. Reserve Affairs reiterates (as previously stated in the advisory opinion dated 16 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10223-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100BJGDocket No:10223-0516 April 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested, in effect, that the fitness report for 1 October 2000 to 31 May 2001 be modified, in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS’s) letter dated 3 January 2005, by raising the marks in sections...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00548-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10767-08
oe A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2009. You did not complete any Reserve drilis or active duty service after that date. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08398-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00307-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 5 May 1998, and were assigned to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06100-01
considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. That form shows The statement of service also shows that you continued to serve in the Air Force Reserve until you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 April 1996. Although an Air Force separation document states that your military obligation termination date was 30...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10295-07
When informed of the recommendation, you waived the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) dated 31 January 2008 with enclosures and 24 March 2008, copies of which are attached. However, the Board found enclosure (1) to the advisory opinion dated 31 January 2008 established a valid basis for your commanding officer's (CO's) loss of confidence in your ability to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08032-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 4 October 2000. The VA denied your request for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09014-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service on release from active...