Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10772-07
Original file (10772-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEH
 Docket No. 10772-07
10 Dec 07






Dear

This is in reference to the application for correction of the naval record of your client US Navy pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your client’s application on 10 December 2007. Your client’s allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your client’s application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your client’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAV MED MPT&E memo of 15 May 07, a copy of which is attached. The Board also considered your response to the NAV MED MPT&E memorandum dated 10 October 0,7.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board noted that your client signed an “Additional Duty Agreement.” That agreement states that the prospective obligated service incurred from the training would be “2 Years.” Additionally, the agreement states that “Full-Time Outservice ADO will be added to any residual obligation.” Additionally, your client executed orders that contained the following provision: “Orders contingent upon your agreement to extend on active duty until July 2009.” The Board gave due consideration









Docket No. 10772-07
to the positions you advocated in the original application and the response to the NAV MED MPT&E memorandum. However, after careful consideration of all of the issues and documents, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
As an additional matter, the Board members considered your client’s request for a personal appearance, however they found that the issues in the case were adequately documented and that a personal appearance with or without counsel would not materially add to the Board’s understanding of the issues involved. Thus, your client’s request for a personal appearance has been denied.
Accordingly, your client’s application and his request for a personal appearance before the Board have been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your client’s case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Your client is entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

W. DEAN P FE IFFER
 Executive Director

Enclosure










2




May 15, 2007
 To:      Head, Pay Section, BCNR, Washington, D.C.
From as sociate Dean for Medical Corps Programs, NAY MED MPT&E
Suhj:    BCNR petition

I have reviewed file and concur with the obligated service worksheet that previously submitted In file that was provided to me by BCNR. the exhibit B has copies of three other physicians’ additional duty agreements. The most important item to note on these 3 additional duty agreements is the date of which they were signed. All three are signed at later dates than ( - agreement. The policy on obligated service changed the year after ass igned his agreement.
as signed his additional duty agreement on April 16, 2002 and in that agreement it says ‘incurred 2 years of obligation from the 1-year FTOS fellowship’. In addition, the orders he received for his FTOS fellowship state ‘orders contingent upon your agreement to extend on active duty until July 2009’.
After review of record, there is no controversy that his active duty obligation incurred for GME is until July 2009. The recommendation from this office is not to change his obligated service date.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003751

    Original file (20090003751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of a Multi-year Special Pay (MSP) and linked Multi-year Incentive Special Pay (MISP) Bonus with an active duty service obligation (ADSO) that runs concurrently with his existing Graduate Medical Education (GME) obligation. The Chief, AMEDD Special Pay Branch, summarized and opined that the applicant met eligibility criteria as outlined above and: a. in order to complete his petition, the applicant must choose an MSP agreement effective date between 1 July 2001...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00662

    Original file (BC-2007-00662.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00662 INDEX CODE: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 SEPTEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) for promotion to major be changed from 17 February 2005 to 17 April 2003. At a minimum, he believes that his date of rank should be changed to the original...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005739

    Original file (20110005739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110005739 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he has served as an Army Obstetrics Gynecologist (OB/GYN) since his date of active duty entry upon completion of his residency in 1998 * in 2007, he was awarded the opportunity to train in an Army sponsored civilian deferred fellowship in the medical subspecialty of Urogynecology from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2010 * during the first year of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050013742C070206

    Original file (AR20050013742C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Active Duty Service Obligation (ADSO) date be changed from 30 June 2007 to 30 June 2006. Although no additional service obligation was added at that time, none was satisfied, which in effect extended the time for him to complete his ADSO. While the Board understands that there may have been other physicians that did not serve an additional year based on their conducting 1 year of research during GME training, that in itself does not nullify the provisions of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200064

    Original file (ND1200064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Decisional issue: The Applicant contends that the narrative reason for his separation, as specified on his DD Form 214, is incorrect and should read “Non-Retention on Active Duty. ” The Applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects an Honorable discharge due to Completion of Required Active Service with a separation code of “KBK” - Voluntary Discharge, Completion of Required Active Service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01188-02

    Original file (01188-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 118842 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United Stares Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05465-06

    Original file (05465-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO 1530 Ser N133D/313 dtd 04 Octp 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010558

    Original file (20110010558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Chief, AMEDD Special Pay Branch states eligibility for the MSP and MSIP agreements requires completion of all education and training obligations –or-8-years of creditable service. The applicant requests that he be allowed to retroactively execute a 2-year MSP contract to be effective on a date prior to the time that he incurred the additional 2-year GME obligation for his current fellowship, which would allow the two obligations to be served concurrently. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014174

    Original file (20100014174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the Fiscal Year 2004 Medical Special Pay message was not readily available in the field and he was unaware he could apply for and receive MSP/MISP to run concurrently with his post-residency fellowship training. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Branch which states that the applicant was eligible for a 2-year MSP/MISP effective 15 June 2004 through 14 June 2006, but for unknown...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013942

    Original file (20090013942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant's records contain a U.S. Army Total Personnel Command, Alexandria, VA, memorandum, subject: Adjusted Active Duty Service Obligation, dated 14 January 2000 that shows, as a participant in residency training in Pathology at Brooke Army Medical Center, he incurred an additional active duty service obligation (ADSO) ending on 16 May 2015. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion indicating whether he was...