Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10710-07
Original file (10710-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

SMS
Docket No: 10710-07
5 September 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF qigygpeiieammealalll

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) Case Summary

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting to change his RE-4 reenlistment code that was
assigned on 29 September 2003, when he was honorably released

from active duty.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. [Mr oes and

Mr. Ries reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 3 September 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the limited corrective action indicated below
should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations

and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. On 30 September 1999, Petitioner enlisted in the Navy at
age 20. On 15 July 2000 and 15 July 2001, he received
performance evaluations in which he was recommended for
retention and promotion and had an individual trait average
(ITA) of 4.0 and 3.67, respectively. On 20 November 2001, he
was awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal
(NMCAM). On 15 June 2002, he received another performance
evaluation in which he was recommended for retention and
promotion and had an ITA of 3.71. On 16 June 2002, he was
promoted to the pay grade of E-4. On 31 October 2002, he was
awarded another NMCAM. On 29 September 2003, he was honorably
released from active duty due to completion of required active
service. At that time a DD Form 214 was issued showing that he
was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. On 19 August 2007, he
was honorably discharged due to the expiration of his obligated

service.

c. In his application, Petitioner states that the RE-4
reenlistment code is incorrect and should be an RE-1 as
evidenced by his overall service record and awards. He further
states that he was not aware of the RE-4 reenlistment code
until he spoke with a recruiter about reenlisting in the

reserves.

d. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment
when a service member is released from active duty due to
completion of required active service and is ineligible or not
recommended for retention. Regulations also authorize
assignment of an RE-1 reenlistment code when a service member

is eligible and recommended for retention.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants relief.
Specifically, the Board finds that there is no evidence in the
record to justify assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. In
this regard, he served without incident and his performance
evaluations that are a matter of record all indicate that he
was recommended for retention and promotion. The Board also
considers his awards that include two NMCAM's, a Good Conduct
Medal, Battle "E" Ribbon, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, Armed
Forces Expeditionary Medal and more than 44 months of sea
service that includes duty in support of Operation Enduring
Freedom. Accordingly, the Board concludes that Petitioner's
record should be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-1

reenlistment code.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code on 29 September 2003,
vice the RE-4 actually assigned on that date.

b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00640-07

    Original file (00640-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 640-07 19 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting an upgrade of his discharge and a change in his reenlistment code. This evaluation recommended him...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07923-08

    Original file (07923-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DBC 20376-5100 SMS Docket No: 7923-08 7 May 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF [ell Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 that was assigned on 25 September 1999, when he was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03253-02

    Original file (03253-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service, separation code and reenlistment code. At the time of Petitioner's separation an average of 2.0 in all the ITA marks assigned during an enlistment was required for an honorable characterization of service. The Board notes his period of good service from 14 April 1998 to 17...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05328-01

    Original file (05328-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was issued an honorable discharge and a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy for two years on 8 May (ITA) of 4.29 in each evaluation. ITA of 1.0 in the unavailable evaluation for the As...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10137-05

    Original file (10137-05.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRG Docket No: 10137-05 28 March 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ggasi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. At that time, he was not recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02338-03

    Original file (02338-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Secretary of the Navy Docket No: 2338-03 12 September 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 T ~ G Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08376-00

    Original file (08376-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United (1) with this Board requesting that show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 code assigned on 13 July 2000 States Navy filed enclosure his record be corrected to . recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. ardhis desire to The Board believes that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06595-08

    Original file (06595-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 6595-08 8 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF ae Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting to be reinstated in the Navy, change his RE-4 reenlistment code, and an honorable discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10307-05

    Original file (10307-05.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRG Docket No: 10307-05 30 March 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF @ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting reinstatement in the Navy or a change in his reenlistment code. That...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05470-06

    Original file (05470-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-S 100SMWDocket No: 5470-06 16 October 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj OF NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner states that he served four years of honorable service and was never the subject of any disciplinary action, but received an RE-4 reenlistment code because he failed two PRT’s. However, regulations also...