Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03562-99
Original file (03562-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A . V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAW ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-5100 

JLP: tj 
Docket No:  3562-99 
24  August  1999 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of  your naval  record  pursuant  to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your application on  24 August  1999.  Your allegations of  error and injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material  submitted in  support thereof, your naval record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS  Memorandum  1780 PERS-604 of  29 July  1999, a copy of  which 
is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members of  the panel  will be  furnished  upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

WAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 IWTEORltY DRIVE 

MILLIWOTON I N  38055-0000 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Via:  Assistant  for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

- 

Ref: 

(a) NPC memo 5420 PERS-00-ZCB of 15 Jul 99 
(b) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 32 
(c) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 30 

The following is provided in response to reference  (a): 

a.  Eligibility for Federally Legislated Educational Benefit 

e

Programs is determined by the member's  initial entry onto active duty. 
Per re e ence  (b), the educational program available to NCl(SW/AW) 
h
Veterans'  Educational Assistance Program  (VEAP) .  Legislation closed 
VEAP to new enrollments on 30 June 1985; enrollment reopened for a 5- 
month period between 28 October 1986 and 31 March  1987.  Members who 
did not enroll before these deadlines lost their eligibility. 

he entered active duty on 27 September 1982 was the 

n

 

b.  The Montgomery GI Bill  (MGIB) Program is available for members 

who entered active duty for the first time after 30 June 1985. 
Reference  (c) does not provide for conversion of VEAP eligibility to 
MGIB except for individuals separating from active duty under the 
Voluntary Separation Incentive, Special Separation Benefit, or certain 
involuntary separations. 

c .  
enroll 
VEAP benefits.  Furthermore,-VEAP enrollment procedures did not 
require the enrollment form  (DD Form 2057) to be maintained  as part of 
the master  s e r v i c e   r e c o r d .   This  f-i-7  w a s   pn7y  used for indicating 
intentions to either enroll in VEAP or defer that decision to a later 
date.  Actual enrollment in VEAP required the servicemember to either 
start an allotment or pay a lump sum amount, thereby establishing a 
VEAP account.  Since NCl(SW/AW) Sundance came onto active duty prior 
to 30 June 1985, he is not eligible for MGIB Program benefits. 

record indicates he did not 
ine and is not eligible for 

Director, Navy Drug &  Alcohol 
Fitness, Education and 
Partnerships Division  (PERS-60) 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04445-00

    Original file (04445-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 23 August 2000, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03720-01

    Original file (03720-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01

    Original file (07306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00765-00

    Original file (00765-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Legislated Educational Benefit Programs is determined by the member's initial entry onto active dut educational program available to SKC active duty on 18 June 1984 was the Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). A review of SKC -record indicates he did not enroll in VEAP before the legislated deadlines and is not eligible...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01

    Original file (07937-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01975-03

    Original file (01975-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). As stated above, references (c) and (d) provided opportunities to "VEAP participants" not 'VEAP-era members. could convert VEAP eligibility to states he was never afforded the he learned of a period of time when was not d. Granting the petitioner's request will not guarantee the Department of Veterans Affairs will award VEAP or MGIB Program benefits since...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02930-01

    Original file (02930-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material applicable statutes, regulations BlJPERS opinion furnished by which is attached. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active Per reference (d), duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). (c) or (d) for members like MS1 VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05606-07

    Original file (05606-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5606-07 28 Aug 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 27 Jul 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03284-01

    Original file (03284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active Per reference (d), duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). (c) or in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06895-01

    Original file (06895-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. references (c) and (d) for members like EN1 participate in VEAP. A review of enroll in VEAP before the not eligible for VEAP benefits.