DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SIN
Docket No: 09277-07
14 November 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 November 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the decision of
the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 7 April 2005, a copy
of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the
findings and conclusions of the NDRB. Additionally, you were
assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your
circumstances. Please be advised that an RE-3B reenlistment code
may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires that a waiver be
obtained from recruiting personnel who are responsible for
determining whether you meet the requirements for reenlistment.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it 1s important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Lo Near\
W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Dir Oo
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01798-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. If after thirty days subsequent to receipt of this letter you have not yet received a DD Form 215 correcting your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06215-07
Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 November 1998, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 19. Given your BCD that resulted from a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09137-07
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. If the NDRB denies your request for recharacterization of the discharge, you may appeal that decision to this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03581-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJNDocket No: 0358l-0722 January 2008This is in reference to your application for correctionof your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code Section 1552.A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Naval Records sitting in execute session, considered your application on 16 January 2008, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06102-07
On 15 December 1993, the separation authority approved the separation recommendation and directed a UD by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. On 4 January 1994, you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04202-08
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05457-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 13 April 2000, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 29 September 2002, one...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10421-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a | presumption of regularity attaches to all official records Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09105-08
In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 6 August 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10679-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You requested an advisory opinion (hereinafter “Applicant”) application, docket #10679-07, which requested invalidation of a non-judicial punishment (NJP) and restoration of his...