DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 9137-07
2 July 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 June 2008. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 23 May 2000 at age 28, with prior
service in the Army National Guard. At that time, you had a six
year old daughter. On 20 April 2003, another daughter was born.
On 8 March 2004, you reported to the USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN
71). Subsequently, you indicated that you could not comply with
the provisions of the Family Care Plan Certificate and were
unable to deploy. Consequently, you were processed for an
administrative discharge by reason of parenthood, which you did
not contest.
The performance evaluation for the period 1 November 2003 to 27
January 2005 is adverse with an individual trait average of 2,29
and you were not recommended for promotion or retention in the
Navy. After review of your record, the discharge authority
directed a general discharge and you were so discharged on 27
January 2005. At that time, you were not recommended for
reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
record and the quality of your entire service is unknown. Based
on the content of the last performance evaluation, the Board
concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code was correctly assigned.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
As noted in the enclosed letter, the Navy Personnel Command has
taken administrative action to correct your DD Form 214 to show
your service prior to enlistment in the Navy.
Please be advised that if you have not already done so that you
are eligible to apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB)
to request recharacterization of your general discharge to a
fully honorable characterization of service. If the NDRB denies
your request for recharacterization of the discharge, you may
appeal that decision to this Board. A DD Form 293 used to
petition the NDRB is enclosed for your use.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\a ns
. DEAN PFE
Executive Dixe
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05727-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedy of applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06215-07
Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 November 1998, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 19. Given your BCD that resulted from a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06370-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board is prohibited from reviewing discharges or reasons for discharge in cases such as yours until the case has first been reviewed by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00726-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08361-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. You may be eligible to request recharacterization of your discharge and a change to the reason for your discharge by submitting an application to the Naval Discharge Review Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05975-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 25 March 1986 at age 19. After review, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05427-06
Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and Policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 20 December 2002 you were found physically qualified for enlistment in the Navy. However, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11034-07
+ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered application on 13 November 2008. tion of your of the United Naval our Your allegations |jof error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceédings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00462-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Although your last performance evaluation is not filed in your record, the Board believed that the diagnosis of dependency and your refusal of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01630-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. You were notified that you were being administratively separated due to parenthood with an honorable discharge and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an "Official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...