DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG
Docket No: 462-08
26 June 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 June 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 11 February 2004 at age 23 with a six
year old daughter. You then served in a satisfactory manner for
over a year. On 7 November 2005 you received nonjudicial
punishment for making a false official statement. On 20 June
2006 you reported to the USS HARRY S. TRUMAN (CVA 75).
Although your final evaluation and your separation processing
documentation is not yet filed in your record, it appears that
you became unable to sign a Family Care Plan Certificate and were
processed for an administrative discharge by reason of
parenthood. You were honorably discharged for that reason on 9
March 2007. At that time, you were not recommended for
reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Your record contains an entry dated 8 March 2007 which states
that you had been diagnosed as drug or alcohol dependent.
However, you declined to accept 30 days of inpatient treatment.
That same day you acknowledged that you would be assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code. Although your last performance evaluation is
not filed in your record, the Board believed that the diagnosis
of dependency and your refusal of treatment were sufficient to
support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Therefore,
the Board concluded that the reenlistment code was properly
assigned and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
los
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Dir Oo
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09710-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12294-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This comment supports the decision not to recommend you for retention in the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06729-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 May 2002 at age 19. on 3 June 2003 you were referred for a psychiatric...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01944-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 3 October 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 4 March 1991, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03743-08
During the period from 26 June. The Board also considered the medical documentation submitted in support of your case. It also appears that your fraud continued when you enlisted in the Army National Guard by obtaining a waiver of your physical disability while serving in the Marine Corps and, by omission of your service in the Navy, which included the diagnosis of a severe personality disorder and nonrecommendation for reenlistment, both resulting in the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08670-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 11 May 2006 at age 25 and reported to recruit training that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11232-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 August 2006 at age 18. You were counseled regarding your condition, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10130-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09703-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00546-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2010. However, the SARP at Corpus Christi Hospital and your command Drug and Alcohol Program Assistant (DAPA) Ggtermined that you were an alcohol rehabilitation failure and it was recommended that you be separated for not complying with the Peonmended treatment. On 27 February 2008, your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which...