DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 9001-07
22 April 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 March 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of. probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that .you enlisted in the Navy on 19 August 1941.
On 27 October 1942 your ship was sunk by enemy forces.
Subsequently you received three nonjudicial punishments and were
convicted by a summary court-martial and a-general court-martial
for offenses that included unauthorized absences, using abusive
language, failure to obey a lawful order, reckless driving,
illegal use of ship’s services, breaking arrest, and forging a
Navy pass. On 2 December 1946 you received a general discharge
by reason of expiration of term of service.
The Board did not accept your unsubstantiated contention to the
effect that your misconduct was caused by or related to the
effects of an undiagnosed posttraumatic stress Gisorder. [It
concluded that your service was properly characterized as under
-. honorable conditions in view of your extensive disciplinary
record, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in
the interest of justice for the Board to upgrade your discharge
to fully honorable. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
Concerning your request for a record of all the medals and
ribbons you are entitled to, you should write PERS 313E, Room
5409, 9700 Page Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63132.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
.In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
T records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\y Seong
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di t
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07586-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 August 1971 at age 17. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05722-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 1999. On 6 April 1948 the Secretary of the Navy mitigated the dishonorable discharge to a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06161-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your overall record of service in the Navy,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02758-07
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01800-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07765-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00108-08
00108-08 20 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04771-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03093-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser N13OD2/07U0Xxx of 11 Mar 08, a dopy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04952-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 1980 you were convicted by a special court martial for unauthorized absence from 16 June to 13 November 1979, a period of 150 days; failure to go to your appointed place of duty and missing ship's movement. were...