Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04771-07
Original file (04771-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 4771-07
14 October 2008

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 October 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 18 April 1962.
You received two nonjudicial punishments and were convicted by a
summary court-martial and a special court-martial. Your offenses
included unauthorized absences, breaking restriction,

hitchhiking, taking unauthorized liberty, assault, altering a
Selective Service card, and leaving the ship without a liberty
card. On 18 March 1964 you were released from active duty and
transferred to the Navy Reserve with a characterization of
service of under honorable conditions.

The Board found that you did not qualify for an honorable
discharge because your conduct mark average of 2.71 was below the
required 3.0 minimum average which you did not attain because of
your four disciplinary actions. In addition, there is no
evidence that you were unfairly or improperly disciplined because

of your race. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a

presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval

record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\

W. DEAN PF]
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01073-02

    Original file (01073-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04030-07

    Original file (04030-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01439-01

    Original file (01439-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. court- martial (SPCM) of disobedience and a day of unauthorized absence (UA) month, a $50 forfeiture of pay, - You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02395-09

    Original file (02395-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2010. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. It also considered your statement regarding your period of service and the circumstances resulting in your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03225-02

    Original file (03225-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your conduct marks average was 2.0. such as your prior honorable In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, service and your contention, in effect, that you have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01428-07

    Original file (01428-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09253-07

    Original file (09253-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received a general discharge on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07950-05

    Original file (07950-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 11 October 1967 at age 18. Subsequently, on 22 September 1969 an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00508-01

    Original file (00508-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    to duty were denied and you received the bad conduct discharge on 27 September 1962. The Board concluded that there was no connection between the hepatitis and the offenses which resulted in your conviction and discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02060-00

    Original file (02060-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 January 1959 you received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty. thereafter, on 27 February 1959, you were convicted by SCM of The punishment imposed was reduction to - absence from your appointed place of duty and were sentenced to hard labor for 35 days. concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your discharge given your frequent misconduct, which resulted in nine NJPs and two court-martial convictions, and since your conduct average was...