DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 8924-07
3 September 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 September 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 25 September
2007, a copy of which is attached.
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Consequently,
record, the bu
existence of p
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103 iN RER}YRGFER TO:
MMER/RE
SEP 2 5 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
wpTION IN THE CASE OF FORMER CORPORAL, sega
me xxx xx suss: RECopE
Subj:
Encl: (1) NAVMC 118(11) of 6 Feb 04
(2) Report of Results of Trial dtd 8 Dec 03
(3) RELM dtd 5 Feb 04
(4) Ei, >> Form 149 of 21 Jun 07
. _ service record has been reviewed and it has
been determined that at the time of separation he was assigned
a. reenlistment code of RE-4, which means that he was not
recommended for reenlistment. The reenlistment code was
correctiv assigned and was based on his overall record.
’ a was honorably discharged on March 31, 2004 by
reason of non-retention on active duty. A review of his service
record indicates that he was counseled concerning receiving a
RE-4 reenlistment code due to service limitations. The
disciplinary portion of his record shows he received one Special
Court-Martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for
fraternization and adultery. It is also noted that the
Commandant of the Marine Corps authorized half payment of
enlisted separation pay and directed the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code. Enclosures (1) through (3) pertain.
3. After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters
concurs in the professional evaluation of aii
qualifications for reenlistment at the time of separation.
a cede is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or
upgraded as a result of events that occur after separation or
based merely on the passage of time.
4. Enclosure (4) is returned for final action.
ACLE,E
C. LEWIS IIT
Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps
Head, Performance Evaluation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09010-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Headquarters, Marine Corps, Performance Evaluation Review Branch dated 28 September 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05447-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory Opinion furnished by Headquarters United States Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09483-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Headquarters, Marine Corps, Personnel Management Division dated 9 October 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01706-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 31 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01384-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member’s acceptability for reenlistment at the time of separation from the Marine Corps. Enclosure (3) is returned for final action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10418-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to gunnery sergeant (pay grade E-7) from 1 July 1994 to 1 July 1993; and changing the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to master sergeant (pay grade E-8) from 1 April 2001 to 1 April 2000, to reflect...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10418-07
By enclosure (2), the Assistant General Counsel (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) directed that a new panel of the Board consider Petitioner’s case, and that the panel’s recommendation be forwarded to him for review and final disposition. d. In one of Petitioner’s prior cases, docket number 6843-05, the Board addressed his contention that when the FY 2005 Master Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board considered him, he had only two observed fitness reports since his restoration to active duty in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04541-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08916-07
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08348-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 3. after a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters concurs in the professional evaluation of a...