DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 ore)
JRE
Docket No. 08792-07
12 August 2008
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 August 2008. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
evidence in connection with your request for reconsideration of
your previous application for upgrade of your discharge.
Accordingly, the Board affirmed its previous findings, which are
set out in a letter to you dated 20 July 2000.
With regard to your new request, the Board could not find any
indication in the available records that you were unfit for duty
by reason of physical disability, or that you met the criteria
for a hardship discharge. [In addition, the Board noted that you
would not have been entitled to disability separation or
retirement even if you had been unfit for duty, as your
administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions
would have taken precedence over and precluded disability
evaluation processing.
In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
rm
Nu
Executive D ckdr
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06051-08
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10210-07
On 11 September 2008, a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered only so much of your application as pertains to your request for disability separation. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09644-07
09644-07 11 August 2008 Document of your application, ceedings of this ary material cons; i that you did not submit any new material evidence Accordingly, the Board affirmed its previous findings which are contained in 1997 would not have been entitled to disability separation or retirement even if you had been unfit for duty, as your discharge under other than honorable conditions would have taken precedence over and precluded disability evaluation processing. In view of the foregoing,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05707-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. The mititary => departments may assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05598-09
The Board did not reconsider your request for upgrade of your discharge because you did not submit any new material evidence jin support of that request. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval sitting in executive session, considered your new Your allegations of error and cordance with administrative licable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09601-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you were released from active duty on 23 April 1997 and transferred to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08794-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00151-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. The Board found that you served on active duty from 29 March 1989 to 20 August 1992, when you were separated from the Navy with a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11886-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2009. The Board concluded that your belated decision to request retention in the Navy Reserve in lieu of discharge, and to undergo elective knee surgery, are insufficient to demonstrate that you were improperly found unfit for duty by the PEB, or to warrant rescinding the orders that directed your discharge from the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00173-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2008. The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 2 August 1971. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.