DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 7507-07
29 July 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 July 2008. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 7 August 1992.
On 27 March 2007 an administrative discharge board recommended
that you be separated from the Navy with an honorable discharge
by reason of physical standards based on five physical fitness
assessment failures. After review by the discharge authority,
the recommendation for separation was approved and you received
an honorable discharge on 1 June 2007 and were assigned a reentry
code of RE-4,
The Board concluded that the failure of five physical fitness
assessments was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4
reentry code. Further, there is no evidence of record which
Supports your contention that you were treated unfairly because
of your race and/or pay grade. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\Rak
W. DEAN PF
Executive D2 xr
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05509-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00290-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2010. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were not physically qualified for release from active duty on 2 October 2008, or that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 27 May 2009, when you were discharged by reason of physical fitness assessment failure, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09512-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08259-07
08259-07 29 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08259-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. The Board concluded that your receipt of a substantial disability rating from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record, because the VA assigned that rating without regard to the issue of your fitness to perform military duty at the time of your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02835-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. An RE-3F reentry code is the most favorable code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to physical standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00352-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code because of your misconduct, which resulted in NUP, deficiencies in your performance, continuous failing of physical fitness tests, and the nonrecommendation for retention; all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05106-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2008. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06997-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 16 November 1999, you enlisted J~n the Navy at age 20. Given your last performanceevaluation that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01859-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2011. On your last enlisted evaluation report it was noted that you failed three Physical Fitness Assessments (PFA) within a four year period and were not recommended for retention in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...