DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 06758-07
1 July 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 June 2008. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you were discharged form the Marine Corps
on 17 May 1985 by reason of pregnancy. You underwent a surgical
procedure on 4 June 2001, with a preoperative diagnosis of
internal derangement of the right knee. The postoperative
diagnosis was changed to degenerative lateral meniscus tears and
grade 2 chondromalacia. The results of that surgery and revised
dignoses do not demonstrate that your knee condition was
misdiagnosed as chondromalacia while you were on active duty
more than a decade earlier, or that you were unfit for duty by
reason of physical disability on the date of your discharge from
the Marine Corps. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
EAN PF
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06935-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2011. The diagnosis of your knee condition was changed to chondromalacia patella (CMP), and you were recommended for discharge because knee pain which interfered with your ability to perform your duties as a recruit. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05936-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 5936-00 18 June 2001
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11886-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2009. The Board concluded that your belated decision to request retention in the Navy Reserve in lieu of discharge, and to undergo elective knee surgery, are insufficient to demonstrate that you were improperly found unfit for duty by the PEB, or to warrant rescinding the orders that directed your discharge from the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00322-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS AVY ANNEX a IN a JRE WASHING 20370- A TON DC S100 Docket No. 00322-09 5 June 2009 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01381-07
Your contention that you did not play any “kind of ball” before you enlisted is contradicted by entries in your naval record and not probative of the existence of probable material error or injustice in your record. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your condition was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01381-07
Your contention that you did not play any “kind of ball” before you enlisted is contradicted by entries in your naval record and not probative of the existence of probable material error or injustice in your record. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your condition was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06393-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The medical board determined that you did not meet the minimum physical standards for enlistment because of the OD, and recommended that you be discharged without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05664-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09264-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your receipt of a 0% disability rating from the VA does not demonstrate that you were erroneously discharged from the Marine Corps by reason of a condition, not a disability. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05402-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 August 1985. On 3 December 1985, a...