Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05904-07
Original file (05904-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 SJN
 Docket No: 05904-07
19 June 2008

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 10 January 2007 at age 20. Based on the information currently contained in your record it appears that you were subsequently involuntarily processed for an entry level separation due to entry level performance and conduct. In connection with this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and the separating authority would have approved a recommendation for separation. The record clearly shows that on 9 February 2007, you were discharged with an entry level separation. At that time you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to entry level performance and conduct. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.
 Further, the Board employed a presumption of regularity pertaining to your discharge. This means that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, your discharge will be presumed to be proper as issued. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.




It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


ROBERT D. Z SALMAN
 Acting Executive Director



























2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01779-08

    Original file (01779-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations direct the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged by reason of erroneous entry due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01836-08

    Original file (01836-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00651-08

    Original file (00651-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00305-08

    Original file (00305-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel|of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support |thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 September 2007,| enlistment processing documents were completed in which you denied ever using illegal drugs.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04620-07

    Original file (04620-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 2007 at age 21. As a result, you were processed for an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08315-07

    Original file (08315-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 July 2007 at age 18. Subsequently, on 30 July 2007 you were discharged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11009-07

    Original file (11009-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel Records, sitting in application on 20 Au injustice were revie regulations and proc this Board. On 31 October 2007, yY on the information cxf appears that your acc illegal substance and to your application fox] DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 11009-07 21 August 2008 correction of your to the provisions of tltle 10 of the kection 1552. of the Board for Correction of Naval xecutive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09703-07

    Original file (09703-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09710-07

    Original file (09710-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09187-07

    Original file (09187-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2008. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.