Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00305-08
Original file (00305-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

SMS
Docket No: 305-08

21 August 2008

 

This is in reference]to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

ra.

A three-member panel|of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 August 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support |thereof, your naval record, and applicable
Statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conlscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board foumd the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the exisltence of probable material error or

injustice.

On 13 September 2007,| enlistment processing documents were
completed in which you denied ever using illegal drugs. on

19 September 2007, yoh enlisted in the Navy Reserve at age 19
and began a period of| active service on 13 November 2007.

Based on the information currently contained in the record, it
appears that your commanding officer subsequently recommended
you for an entry level separation by reason of fraudulent entry
due to drug abuse. Im connection with this processing, you
would have acknowledgé¢d the separation action-and been given an
opportunity to submitla statement. Apparently, the separation
authority approved the discharge recommendation. On

20 December 2007, you |were discharged with an entry level
separation by reason df fraudulent entry due to drug abuse and
assigned an RE-4 reenllistment code.

 

Regulations authorize |the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment
code to members who are discharged due to fraudulent entry.
Given your failure tp
enlistment process an
stopped long before

treated no different
could not find an er

RE-4 reenlistment colt
denied. The names an

ly

disclose pre-service drug use during the
d your admission that your drug abuse

ou enlisted, and since you have been

than others in your situation, the Board
or or injustice in the assignment of the
e. Accordingly, your application has been
d votes of the members of the panel will

be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that
that favorable actior
have the Board recon
and material evidencd
by the Board. In th
that a presumption of
records. Consequent]
official naval record
demonstrate the exist
injustice.

It

Y,

the circumstances of your case are such
cannot be taken. You are entitled to

sider its decision upon submission of new

or other matter not previously considered
s regard, it is important to keep in mind
regularity attaches to all official

when applying for a correction of an

, the burden is on the applicant to

ence of probable material error or

Sincerely,

FOR W. DEAN Soho FER

Executive Director

1 ot

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01836-08

    Original file (01836-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04620-07

    Original file (04620-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 2007 at age 21. As a result, you were processed for an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00651-08

    Original file (00651-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01779-08

    Original file (01779-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations direct the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged by reason of erroneous entry due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07435-10

    Original file (07435-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2011. The reentry code assigned by the Navy is not binding upon the other services, which are free to accept or reject an application on the basis of ‘their own standards# If another branch of service decides to ‘waive your reentryt code and accept you for enlistment, the Navy will not object. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01932-09

    Original file (01932-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2010. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 18 April 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11009-07

    Original file (11009-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel Records, sitting in application on 20 Au injustice were revie regulations and proc this Board. On 31 October 2007, yY on the information cxf appears that your acc illegal substance and to your application fox] DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 11009-07 21 August 2008 correction of your to the provisions of tltle 10 of the kection 1552. of the Board for Correction of Naval xecutive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4134 14

    Original file (NR4134 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0431 14

    Original file (NR0431 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered our application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01

    Original file (00069-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...