DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SJN
Docket No: 03966-07
19 August 2008
This is in reference tlio your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant |to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1/552.
A three-member panel olf the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 August 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedpres applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary naferial considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval retord, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is attached.
After careful and cons¢ientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existencd of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, the Bodrd substantially concurred with the
comments contained in tthe advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot! be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its ddcision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularilty attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when appllying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is om the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
od
re2_W. DEAN PFETFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06474-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05161-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07573-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07983-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10620-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06325-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2009. In this regard, the Board noted that the recommendation, in the MCRC advisory opinion dated 3 September 2008, to remove this documentation gave no basis for concurring with your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09049-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 March 2008 with enclosures and 2 April 2008, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03038-09
, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 28 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, dated 20 May. 2009 with attachment and 19 August 2009, and the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 June 2009, copies of which are attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06320-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting application on 2 injustice were r regulations and Board. in executive session, considered your February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09812-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. The Board found the adverse combat fitness report cited in the advisory opinion made your selection definitely unlikely, even if your record not only had been purged of the contested report whose removal has been directed, but also included the later filed combat fitness report for 2 May to 19 August 2007. Consequently, when applying for a...