DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 07983-07
14 July 2008
Dear ST,
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July
2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser. 811/458 of 19 Jun 08, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances. of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive e xr
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
$720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1430
Ser 811/458
19 Jun 08
Via: PERS-31C
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO FORMER
Ref: (a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 21 Aug 07
(b) BUPERINST 1430.16
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.
2. The petitioner is requesting to be advanced to AOc.
3. The member’s record shows member was in the Naval Reserves from 27
June 1947 to 01 August 1968 and was discharged as an AO1l. The
reférenced Page-4 indicates member completed the practical factors and
the requirements for AOC, not that he was advanced.
4, In view of the above, recommend member's record remains as is.
5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a) for the use by the
Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1)
returned.
Cz KAI
C. E. AIMESTILLMAN
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression
is
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01413-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10423-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01587-09
Your previous case, docket number 11271-07, was denied on 15 May 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) [or use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09999-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/034 of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10194-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/ of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06957-07
consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. After a thorough review of petitioner’s service record it was discovered that the petitioner was advanced to AEM3c(T) on 1 December 1945 and was separated from active duty on 28 July 1946 as an AEM3c(T). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05868-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 05868-08 18 August 2008 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05909-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06548-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materia] submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable gtatutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is Jan advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Cdrrection of Naval Records (BCNR) only.