Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
25 March 1999
4911-98
1Oi United
Your allegations of error and
in, reference to your application for correction of your
This is
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 March 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
was
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted
material
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 March 1956 at
an aptitude
On 17 May 1956, while in recruit training,
age 19.
board found that you were a slow learner and unable to fold your
That board recommended that you be discharged with a
clothes.
You received a
general discharge by reason of unsuitability.
general discharge on 22 May 1956.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
given your brief period of service, and your inability or
unwillingness to fulfill the requirements of recruit training.
Further, regulations in effect at the time of your service stated
that individuals separated due to unsuitability would receive a
Therefore, no change to the discharge is
general discharge.
The
warranted.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
However,
the Board concluded that these factors were
such as your youth and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03470-07
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS . A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 1956. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00589-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 May 1954 at age 18. You were issued a general discharge on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02104-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. A special court-martial convened on 9 August 1956 and convicted you of the foregoing period of unauthorized absence of about 76 The court days and missing ship's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09618-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 25 January 1971 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of unsuitability due to a character and behavior disorder and a defective attitude. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02052-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 1999. You were so discharged on 19 May 1943. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01
You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12233-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2011. On 13 June 1956, you received a general discharge due to unsuitability (personality disorder), and were not recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07990-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. You were issued a When an individual was discharged due to unsuitability, character service, was based, in part, on conduct and overall trait averages computed from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06098-01
evaluated by a Navy Psychologist and recommended for separation from the Marine Corps basic training due to failure to adapt. An entry level separation and problems related to You were diagnosed with a On 9 June 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of convenience of the government due to defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosed personality disorder. You were so discharged on 17 June 1999...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04246-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 7 December 1970, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 17 with parental consent. Although no...