Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02282-07
Original file (02282-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


MEH
Docket No. 2282-07
27 May 08

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
        
        
En cl :    (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
                  (2)      CNO memo 1160 Ser N130D2/O8U030l of 7 Mar 08
                  (3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay
(SDAP)

2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 May 2008 and, pursuant to its regulation~, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2) , the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.



Docket No. 2282-07

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       He is entitled to 5DAP at the SD-2-l50 rate for NEC 9580, retroactive to 30 January 2006, while assigned to as the


b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIA M J. HESS, III
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.




27 May 2008
         W. DEAN PFE IFFER
Executive Director
















2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02948-07

    Original file (02948-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay(SDAP)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 May 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02282-10

    Original file (02282-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No, 2282-10 15 Mar 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00016-08

    Original file (00016-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, ‘and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. On 31 December 2008 Petitioner applied to the Board to correct his record to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03735-11

    Original file (03735-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 bgCc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show restoration of annual leave. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on i August 2011...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03884-08

    Original file (03884-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08698-08

    Original file (08698-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 8698-08 29 Sep 08 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09142-07

    Original file (09142-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He retired in pay grade 0-4 on Docket No. After a careful review of all the evidence, the Board unanimously concludes that the record should be changed to show that Petitioner made a timely claim for his retirement pay to be computed based on pay grade 0-4. On 1 October 1998, NPC PERS 822 approved the request and submitted the documents to DFAS-Cleveland showing the Petitioner's retirement pay would be based on pay grade “0-4” vice “0-3" effective 1 October 1998. b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10001-07

    Original file (10001-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09591-07

    Original file (09591-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03409-08

    Original file (03409-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...