Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01196-07
Original file (01196-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


M EH
Docket No.
1196—07
28 Aug 07




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser N130D2/07U0588 of 13 Aug 07, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.




                                                                                         
Sincerely,






Enclosure




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. DC. 20350-2000





1160
Ser N130D2/07U0588
13 August 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR   DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS

Subj: REQUES T FOR ADVISORY OPI NION ~


Ref:     (a) Department of Defense financial Management Regulation (DODFMR)

End:     (1) BCNR Case No. 01196-07

1.       The attached case of former
01196-07 at enclosure (1), has been reviewed Case No.

2.       N13OD recommends disapproval of ,request to stop the unearned portion of her enlistment bonus (EB) 1i%tfli~t~ij~fli~j was discharged with SPD code JFX, Administrative Discharge for Personality Disorder. In accordance with reference (a), Navy recoups the unearned portion of a bonus from those Sailors administratively discharged for personality disorder.

3.       I am the POC for this case. or by email: Contact me at comm. 703-695-3130 n avy.mil for instructions.



Program Analyst
Enlisted Bonus
Program




For Qtjicial Use On/v —Privacy Sensitive —Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure may result in both civil and criminal penalties.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07973-07

    Original file (07973-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material of your application, together with thereof, your naval record and and policies. In ntially concurred with the comments Accordingly, your application has of the members of the panel will be ances of your case are such that You are entitled to have the Board ission of new and material evidence neidired by the Board. He has requested that recoupment of his SRB be stopped.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5701 13

    Original file (NR5701 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jn your case, the Board agreed with the advisory opinions that, because you did not gain and maintain proficiency in the community and for the NEC that you received the bonus, in the Board’s view, recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonus was appropriate. After reviewing all the circumstances in your case, in the Board’s view, the decision to recoup the unearned portion of the bonus was just, and the half separation pay you received was properly awarded according the Separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01762-07

    Original file (01762-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 N130D2/Ser07U0467 of 16 Aug 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09270-07

    Original file (09270-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser N130D2/08U0282 of 29 Apr 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03272-07

    Original file (03272-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a waiver of the recoupment of the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Ruskin, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03093-07

    Original file (03093-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser N13OD2/07U0Xxx of 11 Mar 08, a dopy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01900-01

    Original file (01900-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory I2 October 2001, a copy of 130D2/0 1 II 1296 of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8226 14

    Original file (NR8226 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U0995 of 28 July 2014 and OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U01313 of 8 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07028-09

    Original file (07028-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, » sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. declination of the Enlistment Bonus (EB) be recinded and he be_ allowed to receive an EB for his rating.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05290-02

    Original file (05290-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. comment and recommendation on former requests the recoupment petition. case was ed portion of N130 recommends denial is not entitled to keep the SRB is a retention incentive paid to enlisted members serving 2 .