DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC
Docket No. 2010-06
2 May 06
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In
addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC
memorandum 5420 PERS-480/0142, 14 April 2006, a copy of each is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a
majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this
connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to
keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely
W.DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-00000
5420
PERS-480/0142
14 April 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C)
Subj: REQUES T FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF
Ref: (a) U.S. Code, Title 10
End: (1) BCNR File 02010-06
1. Enclosure (1) is returned recommending request to receive
back pay based on his new service entry grade credit be
2. of fers no new evidence to support his request for, back pay. The
new service entry grade credit enables LT to be eligible for the
FY-07 Active Staff Lieutenant Commander Promotion Board as an above zone
not previously considered eligible, however service entry grade credit
does not apply for pay purposes. has not been considered before a
promotion board; therefore, his request for back pay based on a promotion
with a year group that is consistent with his new service entry grade
credit should be denied.
3. Recommend LT request be denied.
Director, Office Career
Progression Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00685-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found your not having been selected for promotion to CW04 did not justify reversing its previous action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09248-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was promoted to commander at the 16 year point and was within the flow point guidelines.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05054-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his 20 May 2006 commissioning in the Medical Service Corps was in the grade of lieutenant (pay grade 0-3), vice lieutenant junior grade (pay grade 0-2).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Hess and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 January...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08791-06
Subj:REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lippolis and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice on 11 January 2007, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09138-06
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Exnicios and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice on 14 December 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They specifically recommended that his lieutenant commander date of rank (and by implication, effective date) be adjusted to 1 October 2005.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05819-06
The member’s statement and the reporting senior’s endorsement are both included in the member’s record. In this case, the reporting senior assigned the member a promotion recommendation of “Promotable,” which in no way equates to deficient performance. Concur with comments and recommendations found in reference (a)2 After examinationDD Form 149, we find no request that is actionable by PERS-480does not request that her failures of selection be removed nor does she request a special...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01349-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC memorandum 1920, Ser 4834/031, 21 Jun 06 and NPC letter, 5420 POOJ6/1l3, 19 October 2006, a copy of each is attached. Members advanced under these procedures must be serving, in temporary officer status on the date enlisted advancement is effected.6. Accordingly,met both requirements in Aug 04, and his advancement to E—8 would have been effective 1 Jul 04.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07367-06
The Board also considered your letter dated 16 January 2007.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence Of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, the member’s record was reviewed and he was selected for promotion to the grade of Lieutenant Commander, with this report in his record. h. If directed by the Board for Correction of Naval Records, PERS-3 11 will accept a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04794-07
Under that formulamost officers promoted approximately one year after graduation from law school, but there were frequent anomalies.The new implementing instruction, OPNAVINST 1120.11 signed on 29 December 2005, awards constructive service credit upon commencement of active duty at Naval Justice School. The accessions detailer notified all FY07 accessions after the instruction came out, nearly a year before they began active duty, thus giving the group time to adjust their promotion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04795-07
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Additionally, the FY07 accession year group all have been treated similarly: they are all subject to the promotion guidelines of the new instruction.Although the officers rely on the argument that they began “processing” when the old instruction was in effect, what actually matters is what instruction was...