Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10869-06
Original file (10869-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 WJH:djc
 Docket No. 10869-06
7 January 2008

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
         
         Enc l:     ( 1)      Original DD Form 149 w/attac h ments
                  (2)      NPC Memo dtd 7 Feb 07
                  (3)      DFAS ltr dtd 28 Jul 06
                  (4)      Supplementary materials submitted
                           in support of original DD 149
                  (5)      Excerpts from Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject’s surviving spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that after Subject’s death on 4 June 1998, Petitioner submitted a written request for Survivor Benefit Plan (SEP) annuity.
2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Ruskin, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 03 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered an advisory opinion prepared by the Bureau of Naval Personnel, Casualty Assistance Office, a copy of which is attached as enclosure (2)
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
         







         a. were married on 31 August 1962 and    
        
         b.       tr ansferred to the Retired List on 1 July 1974. At that time, he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in the “spouse” category of coverage. He began paying the “spouse” category
          premiums.
C died on 4 June 1998. At that time, he was still enrolled in the “spouse” category of coverage. He had paid “spouse” category premiums from his initial enrollment in 1974 until his death. He was still married to at the time of his death
        
d.       Petitioner, did not make a claim for SBP benefits for a period in excess of six years. Records indicate that when her husband died, she was 68 years old and neglecting her health and personal affairs such that state Adult Protective Service intervention was necessary.
e.       In June, 2006, a private fiduciary acting on behalf of Petitioner applied to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) seeking the SBP annuity for Petitioner. DFAS responded that the claim “must be denied due to (exceeding) the Statute of Limitations.” See enclosure (3)
f.       On 4 December 2006, acting on behalf of Petitioner applied to the Board for Correction of Naval Records seeking a change to entitle Petitioner to SBP benefits. She essentially argued that the six year limitation should be forgiven because of the Petitioner~ mental and physical health. See enclosure (1)
g.       later supplemented the original application with documentation that shows Petitioner has been admitted to the hospital on multiple occasions due to self neglect. Social worker home visits before her husband’s death showed unhealthy and cluttered living conditions. Medical examinations after his death showed Petitioner suffered from alcohol and nicotine abuse. See enclosure (4)
h.       Per enclosure (2), the Bureau of Naval Personnel, provided an advisory opinion recommending that no relief be granted. The advisory opinion points out that a claim against the government must be received within 6 years after the claim accrues. There is no evidence that made an SBP claim within 6 years of her spouse’s death.











Docket No. 10869-06

CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and notwithstanding the opinion expressed in enclosure (2) . the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action The Board relies heavily on the evidence that enrolled in SBP in 1974 and paid (spouse) premiums from the time of his initial SBP enrollment until the time of his death. In general, the Board was of the opinion that in a case where SBP premiums are faithfully paid by a retiree for spouse coverage, after the retiree dies the surviving spouse should receive a SBP annuity. The Board carefully considered DFAS’s interpretation and application of the six year limitation on claims against the government. However, rather than mechanically applying the limitation, the Board concludes that the six year limitation is intended to protect the government from being burdened with the obligation to keep records which would be required to adjudicate claims beyond a six year period. Here, the Board concludes, the records still exist which indisputably show that elected and paid for spouse SBP protection. Additionally, the evidence of Petitioner’s poor physical and mental health militate in favor of excusing her dilatoriness. After a careful review of all the evidence, the Board unanimously concludes that the record should be changed to show that made a timely claim for SBP benefits as required under the regulations governing SEP.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Subject’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       On 5 June 1998, the day after her husband’s death, submitted a proper application to DFAS for commencement of
 the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HE SS, , III
Recorder         Acting Recorder







Docket No. 10869-06





5.       The foregoing action of the Board is submitted for your review and action.



W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director


Reviewed and approved:
Robert T Call
 Assistant General Counsel
Manpower and Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12037-10

    Original file (12037-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s widow, | hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she submitted a timely application for annuity benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) after her husband’s death in 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2010 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1840 14

    Original file (NR1840 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ BPE RS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BEOOre™s BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 761 S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO1840-14 27 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW_OF NAVAL RECORD ICO q Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that, as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00568

    Original file (BC-2006-00568.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior to the servicemember’s 1 October 1963 retirement, he was married and elected spouse and child RSFPP coverage, Option 4 - that allowed the member to terminate RSFPP premium payments in the event the beneficiary lost eligibility. We find no evidence he attempted to elect SBP coverage for the applicant during any of the four open enrollment periods provide by law. Regardless, it appears the servicemember made no attempt to elect SBP coverage for the applicant when he was eligible during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003085

    Original file (20130003085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter from DFAS shows $80.69 was paid in premiums each month in 2000. b. DFAS states the additional money her husband was paying was due to the buy-in premiums or "Open Season" cost. However, only the spouse SBP premiums are refundable through Public Law 92-425. c. Public Law 105-261 states all SBP premiums will be terminated effective 1 October 2008 for all members who are at least 70 years old and have paid SBP premiums for 360 or more months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007341

    Original file (20080007341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the un-remarried former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her ex-husband's records be corrected to show he elected to provide her an annuity as his "former spouse" under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show that the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" on the date of his divorce from the applicant, and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6055 13

    Original file (NR6055 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In May 2013, Petitioner a _— my applied deceased former spouse's to BCNR re ing to correct her " |g record to show that he elected former spouse coverage within one year of his divorce, pursuant to a divorce decree, enclosure (1). to DFAS requesting former spouse SBP coverage within one year of their divorce, as required by law. Although the Board recognized that Petitioner, at that time, did not submit a deemed election within one year from the date of divorce as required by law, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015572

    Original file (20080015572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 April 2006, the Board denied the applicant’s request for correction of the FSM’s records to show he changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse within one year of their divorce. The Board further informed the applicant that should DFAS determine that the FSM’s second spouse is not eligible for the FSM’s SBP annuity, or the applicant can provide irrefutable evidence that the second spouse was not married to the FSM prior to 7 March 2005, she was encouraged to submit a request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00641

    Original file (BC-2013-00641.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With the help of his attorney, he prepared all the necessary documentation to properly claim the SBP entitlement and submitted this information to DFAS. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Her father enrolled in the SBP and subsequently elected maximum spouse and child coverage during an SBP open enrollment, and had a “Helpless Child.” Her mother predeceased her father by approximately...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08701-10

    Original file (08701-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she made a claim for Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity payments within six years following the death of her husband, : 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01116-11

    Original file (01116-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5109 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Subject submitted a timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) electing as the sole beneficiary. In February 2011, Petitioner applied to BCNR...