Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09689-06
Original file (09689-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 DJC
 Docket No. 9689-06
31 January 2007
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL REcQRD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/008 dtd 10 Jan 07
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.
2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.



Docket No. 9689-06 RECONMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       The petitioner was discharged on 28 April 2005 and reenlisted, under the provisions of the STAR program, on 29 April 2005. The term is 6 years.
b.       The petitioner was advanced to Petty Officer Second Class effective 14 June 2006.
c.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HES , III
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


31 January 2007

















2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09761-06

    Original file (09761-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05325-06

    Original file (05325-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04680-06

    Original file (04680-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05180-07

    Original file (05180-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10361-05

    Original file (10361-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01442-07

    Original file (01442-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09771-06

    Original file (09771-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03669-06

    Original file (03669-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/743 dtd 21 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00270-07

    Original file (00270-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10574-06

    Original file (10574-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    10574-06 31 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 2336.2. The...