Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09684-06
Original file (09684-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  LCC
                                                                                                    Docket No. 9684-06
                                                                                                    12 Apr 07




 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1811 PER5-4822, 18 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
         

        
        
        
        
        
         Sincerely,      


W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Dir ector

Enclosure


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
                                             1811
                                                                                                             PERS-4 822
                                                                                                            18 Jan 07



MEMORANDUM FOR   EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-31C
Subj:
Ref:     (a) NPc memo 5420 PERS-31C of 21 Dec 06
End:     (1) BCNR File
1.       Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject’s case. Specifically, Petitioner requests back pay for sea time while a midshipman from 1957 to 1959.
2.       According to the transcript from the member did attend f rom Sept M ay . However documentation exists in his military record that indicates he was a midshipman while attending this college. He was sworn in as an Ensign in the U.S. Naval Reserves on 17 October 1960.
3.       Based on the information above member’s request is disapproved. Enclosure (1) is returned.





Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06277-07

    Original file (06277-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6277-07 17 Dec 07This is in reference to your client’sapplication for correction of naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your client’s application on 17 December 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory Opinion furnished by NPC memo 1920 SER 834/026 of 28 Aug 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06555-06

    Original file (06555-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 31 August 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00472-06

    Original file (00472-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject’s case. Member is not entitled to active duty credit for her time spent at the USNA.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01674-06

    Original file (01674-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. PERS-4822 15 Apr 06 MEMORANDLTM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-31C Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10071-07

    Original file (10071-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner contacted Retired Operations Section (N-152), enclosure (2), requesting clarification on retired status. Per enclosure (4) advancement on the retired list to the grade of CWO2 would result in a loss of pay.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08948-06

    Original file (08948-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48l1E9/034, 22 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08165-06

    Original file (08165-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 PER5-4812, 15 November 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08638-06

    Original file (08638-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10964-06

    Original file (10964-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10964-06 28 Aug 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09248-06

    Original file (09248-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was promoted to commander at the 16 year point and was within the flow point guidelines.