Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09157-06
Original file (09157-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 9157-06
23 February 2007







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were received in accordance with administrative regulations and procedure applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 December 2004. A psychiatric evaluation, conducted on 22 December 2004, diagnosed you with a personality disorder. The evaluation also stated that you concealed three prior suicidal gestures. Subsequently, on 6 January 2005 you received an entry level separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to fraudulent enlistment. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.







It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.





Sincerely,




                                                               W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                               Executive Director






 Enclosure








Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06441-07

    Original file (06441-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Prior to enlistment you answered “no” to all the questions in the marital, dependency status and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06675-06

    Original file (06675-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 June 2005 at age 18 and denied any mental health problems prior to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09954-05

    Original file (09954-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 July 2005. Subsequently, on 30 August 2005 you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03313-09

    Original file (03313-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ddécumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code due to the diagnosed personality disorders that appear to have existed prior to your entry into the service, which was not disclosed, causing your discharge by reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03953-04

    Original file (03953-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Accordingly, your application has been denied.The Board did not consider whether the reason for your separation should be changed because you did not request such action and have no exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09247-06

    Original file (09247-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of thq entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01836-08

    Original file (01836-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00305-08

    Original file (00305-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel|of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support |thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 September 2007,| enlistment processing documents were completed in which you denied ever using illegal drugs.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07641-00

    Original file (07641-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05975-07

    Original file (05975-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 25 March 1986 at age 19. After review, the discharge authority...