Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08380-06
Original file (08380-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
                                                      WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                      CRS
                                                                                 Docket No: 8380-06
                                                                                 5 September 2007


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 August 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 22 May 2006. You underwent psychiatric evaluation on 5 June 2006 and were given diagnoses of a personality disorder and an anxiety disorder. The evaluator concluded that you would pose a risk to yourself and others if retained in the Navy. On 27 June 2006 you received an entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment because of those diagnoses, which are disqualifying for enlistment, and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
An RE-4 reentry code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to Sailors separated by reason of erroneous enlistment, especially if they pose a risk to themselves and others. The Board concluded that your reentry code is not erroneous or unjust, and was properly assigned regardless of whether or not you sane at the time. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.




It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
t he Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice .

Sincerely,


W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Dir ector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04735-07

    Original file (04735-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 July 2006. A psychiatric evaluation conducted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06087-08

    Original file (06087-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03870-03

    Original file (03870-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 30 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10600-09

    Original file (10600-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicabie statutes, regulations, and policies. On 27 Pebruary 2007 you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason OL erroneous entry due to the diagnosed psychiatric problems. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00751-03

    Original file (00751-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given the existence of such a disorder, and since retention would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04207-07

    Original file (04207-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 4 January 2007. Accordingly and as you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02458-08

    Original file (02458-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, On 3 November 1993 the Bureau of Naval Personnel informed your command that you did not qualify for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00941-10

    Original file (00941-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice: You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 25 July 2001. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to your RE-4 reenlistment code given your NUP and diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02644-03

    Original file (02644-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    approved your separation and on 19 December 2001, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed depressive and personality disorders. depressive and personality disorders, would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board Given the severity of the diagnosed and since your retention concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code was properly and Accordingly, your request has been appropriately assigned. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04945 12

    Original file (04945 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.