Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08335-06
Original file (08335-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN
Docket No: 08335-06
4 April 2007

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

      
   

 

Subj: REVIEW OP NAVAL RECORD OF EX

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments

(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting recharacterization of his release from

active duty.

eZ. The Board, consisting of Ms. ieec, Mr Wie, and Mr.
a: , reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 10 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined

that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by

the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as

follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although enclosure (1) was not filed in a timely manner,
it is in the interest of justice to waive the statue of
limitations and review the application on its merits.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 July 1999
at age 18. On 24 May 2000 and 18 January 2001 he received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two periods of unauthorized
absence (UA) totaling 105 days. The cumulative punishment
awarded at these NJP’s included reductions in rank from lance

corporal (LCpl; E-3) to private (Pvt; E-1).
d. After his second NUP, Petitioner remained on active duty
for about 33 months. During this period, he advanced in rank to
CPL . His record during the last 26 months of service reflects
exemplary conduct and excellent performance. Also, he was
deployed to Iraq and earned the Combat Action Ribbon.

e. On 22 October 2003 Petitioner was released from active
duty under honorable conditions at the expiration of his
enlistment and transferred to the Marine Reserve. Petitioner’s

military obligation expires on 20 July 2007.

f. Petitioner’s release was characterized as under honorable
conditions and not fully honorable based on conduct and
proficiency averages computed from marks assigned on a periodic
basis. His conduct average was 3.8. A conduct average of 4.0 is
required for a fully honorable characterization of service.

g. In his application, Petitioner points out that he
completed his enlistment but with a characterization of under
honorable conditions, he is unable to use his benefits under the
Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). He believes that his good conduct
since the second NUP, and his combat service warrant an honorable

characterization of service.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable

action.

Although Petitioner’s record of military service includes NJP’s
for periods of UA totaling more than three months and
characterization of his service as under honorable conditions,
was technically proper given his failure to attain the required
average in conduct, the Board believes that his excellent record
of service after the second NJP earned him a better
characterization of service. During this period, he had no
disciplinary infraction, was advanced in rank to Cpl, performed
his duties, and an excellent manner, and served overseas in
combat. In view of the foregoing, the Board recommends the
following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 22 October 2003 Petitioner was honorably released from active
duty, vice the release under honorable conditions actually issued

on that date. Upon completion of his military obligation, an
honorable discharge should be issued.

b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

c. That upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be
informed that Petitioner’s application was received on

15 September 2006.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

\;5 }
peas
Executive D or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07693-01

    Original file (07693-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 7 July 2000. Since it appears The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's Naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in the reenlistment code. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03468-01

    Original file (03468-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3468-01 31 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (b) Navy-Marine Corps Awards Manual (1) DD Form (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 149‘w/attachments I From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, requesting, in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 May 1972 and that he be awarded the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04949-08

    Original file (04949-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an honorable characterization of service vice the general characterization of service that he received on 20 July 1964, when he was released from active duty. On 5 February 1963, he departed Quantico and at that time his proficiency and conduct mark averages were both 4.1. d. On 22 April 1963, Petitioner reported to Okinawa, Japan, for duty as a weapons...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11631-08

    Original file (11631-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Regulations state that Marines serving on active duty in pay grade E-4 and below will receive SA proficiency and conduct marks on 31 January and 31 July, and Marines who have received proficiency and conduct marks within the prior 90 days will receive SA proficiency and conduct marks of "not available" (NA). The Board also considers his two deployments to Iraq, awards, and present status in the Marine Corps Reserve. c. That Petitioner's naval record be further corrected by removing any...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05531-00

    Original file (05531-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5531-00 8 February 2002 From: To: Subj Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy OF (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 2 December 1962. that his naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07397-07

    Original file (07397-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 7397-07 12 May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF & Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an honorable discharge vice the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11354-07

    Original file (11354-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUJR Docket No: 11354-07 19 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Wi Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board especially notes that Petitioner's conduct and proficiency averages met the requirements for a fully honorable characterization of service. c. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be informed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09239-02

    Original file (09239-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) and changing his reenlistment code. In that (Petitioner) . Turning to the NJP, the Board agrees with the conclusion of JAM that it should be removed from Petitioner’s records since the record does not reflect that his enlistment was extended “with a view to trial.” In this regard,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12321-08

    Original file (12321-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 that was issued on 18 November 2007, when he was honorably released from active duty. d. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, which states, in part, as follows: ... [Petitioner's] service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that at the time of separation he was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06450-01

    Original file (06450-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6450-01 29 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy From: To: Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 December 1952. ...