Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07946-06
Original file (07946-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
                                    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



DJC
Docket No. 7946-06
22 February 2007

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO


Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)      OCNO Memo N131H dtd 12 Feb 07
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB).

2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Mann, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUS ION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.









Docket No. 7946-06

RECONMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       The petitioner was discharged 2 August 2004 and reenlisted on 3 August 2004. The term is 2 years.

b.       The petitioner was discharged 17 July 2006 and reenlisted on 18 July 2006. The term is 6 years.

c.       This change will entitle the member to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB).

d.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4.       It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
        



22 February 2007        
W. DEAN PF I E FFER
Executive Director













2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00675-09

    Original file (00675-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS - 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 bIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed PetitLoner’s allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03970-07

    Original file (03970-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1000 BUPERS 325 dtd 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011590

    Original file (20120011590.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Despite the declaration of the service representative who offered the CSRB to him, the applicant was ineligible for the CSRB when he signed the agreement and would not otherwise be eligible until 3 August 2009. The guidance stated that, among other requirements, eligible officers must have completed any current contractual obligation or bonus contract obligation incurred as a result of participation in the officer affiliation bonus and must have been fully qualified and serving in a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019794

    Original file (20130019794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received a $10,000 bonus in two installments of $5,000 on 6 and 8 February 2008 after being informed by MSG J, the State Incentives Manager, that he was entitled to an officer bonus and the SLRP. (2) The applicant was eligible to contract for the SLRP but was not eligible for the $5,000 SLRP payment ($804.82 of which the loan holder returned to DFAS for overpayment) he received on 20 November 2007 (9 years after the last payment was authorized, and 3 years after the contract would have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002515

    Original file (20120002515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Memorandum for Record, subject: Exception to Policy - CSRB, dated 8 June 2011, with command endorsements, dated 16 June, 26 August, and 10 November 2011, that recommend approval of the applicant's request based on the ABCMR decision that corrected his records to show he was promoted to CPT on 9 July 2009. b. U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), Fort Bragg, NC, memorandum, subject: Exception to Policy, dated 10 January 2012, that disapproved the applicant's request for CSRB based on the fact...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015953

    Original file (20080015953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his approved 2-year CSRB contract dated 1 October 2007, and a message, date/time group 082130Z Sep 06, Subject: Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) for Army Physician Assistant (PA) Officers in the Active Component (AC). Army Regulation 350-100 (Officer Active Duty Service Obligation) establishes guidance on ADSOs for officers, defines how service obligations will be computed and served, and establishes how officers will be notified of service obligations. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017840

    Original file (20130017840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 11A (Infantry) [or AOC 53A (Automation Officer)]. The applicant indicated that he was eligible for a CSRB and that he would complete 6 years of commissioned service on 8 March 2009; the applicant was advised that he did not have to wait until 8 March 2009 to complete the agreement; he was provided instructions to place his initials in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021496

    Original file (20140021496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) for payment of the remaining $10,000.00 of his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) and relief from recoupment of the portion already paid. The applicant states: * he was in an eligible position and eligible for the CSRB in 2008 and the necessary documents were sent to his headquarters and he was paid the first half of the bonus * he inquired about the unpaid portion of the bonus years later and he was informed that a records review was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021245

    Original file (20120021245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The exception to policy memorandum stated he: * had been issued a control number via Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) * executed a CSRB addendum for AOC 19A on 10 April 2008 * received the first installment of $10,000 on 15 May 2008 * the second installment was rejected because his AOC was not listed as a critical AOC on the NGB's approved list of AOCs that qualified for the bonus 21. The applicant's primary skill, 19A, was not a designated skill for the bonus and there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010232

    Original file (20140010232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed the UH-60 Aviator Qualification Course from 28 January through 8 March 2008. An NGB official stated that in accordance with ARNG Implementation Guidance for the CSRB, dated 1 February 2008, eligible officers could receive the CSRB. The applicant served in the ARNG as a warrant officer between 26 June 2006 and 19 January 2010.