Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07759-06
Original file (07759-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT F THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
 Docket No. 7759-06
29 Mar 07










This is in reference to your applicant on for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 0 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0123 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of which s attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the B rd substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisor opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The name and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request t.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an officia1 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
        
         Sincerely ,      






Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00239-07

    Original file (00239-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consiste of your application, together with all material submitted in suppor thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this connection, he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the ad isory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an fficial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate he existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10334-06

    Original file (10334-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of our application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0124 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of which s attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08573-07

    Original file (08573-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8573-07 29 January 2008DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03061-07

    Original file (03061-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 Ser 811E9/283 of 29 May 2007, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10512-06

    Original file (10512-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10512-06 14 Mar 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08304-07

    Original file (08304-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 13 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07869-06

    Original file (07869-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFiCE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01413-08

    Original file (01413-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07213-06

    Original file (07213-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORR CTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 AVY ANNEX WASHING ON DC 20370-5100MEH Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consist d of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulation and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 Nl3ODl/Ser 07U0l25 of 9 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10667-06

    Original file (10667-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0146 of 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...