Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07624-06
Original file (07624-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100
CRS
                                                                                 Docket No: 7624-06
2 January 2008








This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provision5 of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 Dece mb er 2007. Your allegation of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 10 June 2002. You received three nonjudicia l punishments during your enlistment for unspecified offenses. On 9 June 2006 you were released from active duty and transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve with a characterization of service of under honorable conditions.









The Board did not accept your contention to the effect that you should have received marks that would have entitled you to an honorable characterization of service. It noted that your conduct and Proficiency averages were 3.7 and 4.0, respectively. A minimum conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of your release from active duty. You did not meet that criterion because of your extensive disciplinary record. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09580-06

    Original file (09580-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 24 March 1964. Prior to being assigned to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01385-99

    Original file (01385-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of N a n 1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04265-07

    Original file (04265-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 January 1960. On 24 January 1966 you received a general discharge from the Marine Corps Reserve upon the expiration of your enlistment.Characterization of service is based, in part, on one’s conduct and proficiency averages, both of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01134-01

    Original file (01134-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02807-05

    Original file (02807-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02192-08

    Original file (02192-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2009. Due to your disciplinary record and final average conduct mark of 3.8 your release from active duty on 9 July 1976 was characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and your discharge from the Marine Corps on 10 July 1980 was likewise characterized as general. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07727-07

    Original file (07727-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2008. At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04777-08

    Original file (04777-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05076-05

    Original file (05076-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 30 May 2000. Your conduct and proficiency...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06115-99

    Original file (06115-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. administrative discharge stating, in part, as follows: On 23 August 1990 the psychiatrist recommended your You Although not presently considered a danger to himself, he may make further suicidal threats or gestures...