FEB-27-2007 08:40 PERS-312 9018742764 P.002
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX,
WASHINGTON DC 20370-8100 SJN
Docket No: 07226-06
5 February 2007
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) Case Summary ;
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting a change in his reenlistment code.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms WG, Mr NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11374-09
The Board also considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel Command (NPC) attached as enclosure (2) that recommended no relief be granted. Note: If the special evaluation had been factored into Petitioner’s PMA before the examination, Petitioner would have reached the Final Multiple Score necessary to advance from the March 2008 Navy- wide advancement cycle. The Board carefully considered the comments included in enclosure (2) to the effect that a special evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07313-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that a summary court-martial be removed from his record or, in the alternative, that the court-martial sentence be reduced.2. Petitioner has been informed that the Board is prevented by law from reviewing courts-martial and must limit its review to determining if the sentence should be reduced as a matter of clemency.CONCLUSION:Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10728-08
MAJORITY CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of the evidence of record, although incomplete, a majority of the Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn and Pfeiffer, concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. Further, the minority believes that if Petitioner were recommended for reenlistment when he was ‘released from active duty in April 2004, he would have had concerns regarding the RE-4 reenlistment code which bars reenlistment based on the recommendation of his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08220-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 8220-07 5. May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ‘fil Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01902-08
Since his release from active duty Petitioner has been an active driller in the Marine Corps Reserve and earned a promotion to Corporal [E-4]. Unfortunately for Petitioner at the time he was released from active duty he was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code based on the disciplinary action which occurred one month earlier. And finally there is his performance of duty as a Marine Corps reservist and desire to serve on extended active duty and thereby offer his support to the Marine Corps...
However, he stated, “Knowing that the SRB message [a new ALCOAST] was set to come out a month from that time, I opted to just extend for three months to wait and see if the SRB multiple might increase.” The applicant alleged that the YN3 told him that if he extended his enlistment for just 3 months and the SRB multiple changed under the new ALCOAST, he could cancel the extension by reenlisting to get an SRB after he arrived at his new unit. However, there is no Page 7 dated May 1, 2009,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12113-08
rt dln LY MANN EL; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DGC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 12113-08 16 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: : - En eren “REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD . Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing his RE-4 (not recommended) reenlistment code, which was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08102-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 26 May 1989. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was not discharged on 20 May 1989 but continued to serve on active duty until 22 September 1989 when she was released from active duty with her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06554-07
That board considered Petitioner for promotion, but did not select him.d. Based on the findings and action of the PERB, the Board concludes that the marginal fitness reports should not have been part of Petitioner’s naval record when he was considered for promotion in 2006.Whether Petitioner would have been selected for promotion in 2006 or not (without the marginal fitness reports) cannot be known and is largely a matter of conjecture. Moreover, when asked to provide substantive comments...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09103-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 09103-07 21 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF aq See Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with...