Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03674-06
Original file (03674-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2037C>5100


 SRB
Docket No: 3674-06
25 Oct 06
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref.     (a) Title 10 U.S.C.

End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)      RTC ltr 1220 Ser CCC/ dated 12 Oct 06
 (3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, hat the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.

 2.       The Board, consisting of Messr • Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s aIIe ations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant t its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted f the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, egulations and policies.

 3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegation ns of error and injustice, finds as follows:

 a.       Before applying to this B rd, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department o the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.




Docket No. 3674-06 CONCLUS ION
Upon review and consideration of 11 the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents s of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

 RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       Petitioner was advanced t paygrade E—2 effective 3 November 2005, and further corrected to show that he was advanced to paygrade E-3 on 16 Au St 2006.
b.       A copy of this Report of proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it s certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
         
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, III
 Recorder         Acting Recorder

 5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of he Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has be n approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Na



25 October 2006



                                                                         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                       Executive Director



                                            

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03259-06

    Original file (03259-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, hat the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant t its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07107-06

    Original file (07107-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner‘s allegtions of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the correctiveaction indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01343-06

    Original file (01343-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07179-06

    Original file (07179-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Dunn, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03280-06

    Original file (03280-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2.The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice On 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09434-05

    Original file (09434-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt,Geisler and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08683-05

    Original file (08683-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUS IONUpon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06702-06

    Original file (06702-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to paygrade E-3.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07518-06

    Original file (07518-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06328-06

    Original file (06328-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...