Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05675-06
Original file (05675-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100




 CRS
                                                                                         Docket No: 5675-06
22 September 2006




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve and reported for initial active for training (ACDUTRA) on 15 January 2002. On 19 July 2002 you completed ACDUTRA and were assigned to a reserve unit. On 4 January 2003 your urine sample was positive for marijuana. As a result your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged on 14 August 2003 with an other than honorable discharge.
On 15 December 2005 you enlisted in the Marine Corps delayed entry program without acknowledging your prior period of service. It was also found that you had been treated for drug dependency from 21 May to 23 June 2005 thus making you ineligible for enlistment in the Marine Corps. On 31 January 2006 you were released from the delayed entry program by reason of dependency.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reason for separation, given your prior use of drugs. Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded that no change to the separation is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.



It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06702-07

    Original file (06702-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 21 October 2002. On 28 March 2003...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05622-02

    Original file (05622-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. enlistment contract required you to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. Accordingly, your application The names and votes of the members of the panel An individual separated with such a The Board did not consider whether your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03489-03

    Original file (03489-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 22 December 2000 you were discharged with an other than honorable At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code discharge. In fact, you were not recommended Concerning your request to change the RE-4 reenlistment code, as a drilling reservist you should not have a reenlistment code. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06815-05

    Original file (06815-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 7 November 1986. After review by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07890-09

    Original file (07890-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your contentions that you were transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve and should have been advanced to PN3. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00941-08

    Original file (00941-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 Augugt 2008. On 6 March 1978 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfadtory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08703-01

    Original file (08703-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04759-02

    Original file (04759-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contract required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08194-07

    Original file (08194-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2008. You are requesting in effect, that your records be corrected wherever necessary to show that you have 90 days of continuous active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08551-06

    Original file (08551-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 15 December 1995. Under the terms...