Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05329-06
Original file (05329-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                           BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                     2 NAVY ANNEX
                                              WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                                                                                   SMW
                                                       Docket No: 5329-06
                                                                                                    16 October 2006
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Enclosure
(1) Advisory Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
                                                      WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00

 AEG: jdh
Docket No. 05329-06
20 June 2006




         Reference is made to your Application for Correction (DD Form 149).
The records in your case were referred to the appropriate of office for an advisory opinion. The opinion has been received and is enclosed for your information. The opinion is advisory only and not binding upon the Board or the Secretary of the Navy.
If you wish to submit any further statement or additional documentary material in support of your application, YOU should do so within 30 days period, your case will be decided on the evidence of record as a crowded docket will permit.


Sincerely



ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Head, Discharge Section














Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07806-06

    Original file (07806-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMWDocket No: 7806-06 11 January 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08019-06

    Original file (08019-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely, W. DEAN PFIEFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 Integrity...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08558-06

    Original file (08558-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser N32/ of 20 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09542-06

    Original file (09542-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request to restore your security clearance was not considered, as the Board for Correction of Naval Records does not consider this a matter within its purview. In accordance with our standard policy, this letter was sent to the member via his command. We must advise the Board to deny any request for amendment of his record in regard to his current clearance eligibility.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08285-06

    Original file (08285-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02469-06

    Original file (02469-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 25 August 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06563-06

    Original file (06563-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/561 dtd 21 Sep 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02993-06

    Original file (02993-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a) and enclosure (1), service named member provided evidence of completed PQS. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02272-06

    Original file (02272-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04281-06

    Original file (04281-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN PFEFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNELWASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000IN...