Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02465-06
Original file (02465-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 2465-06
9 May 2006


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO


Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Customer Svc. Desk memo 1000 Ser N00/076 of 13 Apr 06
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect 48 RADO months, vice 36.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

 a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUS ION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.


Docket No. 2465-06



RECO MMENDAT ION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a. The RADO months on the reenlistment contract executed on or about 22 February 2006 should reflect 048, vice 036.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS III
Recorder         Acting Recorder


5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



 9 May 2006
         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
         Executive Director
2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03838-06

    Original file (03838-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09328-05

    Original file (09328-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100MEHDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support (FTS) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SK rating.2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegation of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10047-05

    Original file (10047-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    10047-05 28 FEB 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support (FTS) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the BM rating.2. The reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00047-07

    Original file (00047-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner’s contract reflect “USN” vice “USNR”.2. 47-07RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:a. The DD Form 4/3, Jan 2001, executed on or about 13 January 2006 is for 6 years under the provisions of the Manpower Personnel, Navy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08172-06

    Original file (08172-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 _SRB Docket No: 8172-06 22 Nov 06 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj 3 ae . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted, USNR-32 (FTS), vice USN-11. The Board, consisting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10159-06

    Original file (10159-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05814-06

    Original file (05814-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of one-half separation pay when discharged from active duty on 1 February 2006.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03607-06

    Original file (03607-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. The DD Form 4/3, Jan 2001, executed on or about 14 December 2005 is for a term of 4 years, vice 6 years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10151-06

    Original file (10151-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USN, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Hicks, J., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00665-07

    Original file (00665-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner “USNR”, vice “USN”.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Novello, and Mrs. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...