Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00665-07
Original file (00665-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100




 DJC
 Docket No. 665-07
4 April 2007
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW 0 NAVAL RECORD ICO
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC Memo 5730 PERS 4913 dtd 07 Mar 07
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner “USNR”, vice “USN”.

2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Novello, and Mrs. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioiier’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

 a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUS ION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.









Docket No. 665-07
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       The Branch/Class (BR/CL) on the reenlistment executed on or about 15 December 2006 is “USNR”, vice “USN”. The “RADO” should reflect 36 months, and “EREN” should reflect 14 December 2006.
b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
         
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder         Acting Recorder

 5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



 4 April 2007




















2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00047-07

    Original file (00047-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner’s contract reflect “USN” vice “USNR”.2. 47-07RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:a. The DD Form 4/3, Jan 2001, executed on or about 13 January 2006 is for 6 years under the provisions of the Manpower Personnel, Navy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01235-07

    Original file (01235-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner’s contract reflect “USNR(TAR)” vice “USN”.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. McBride, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02836-07

    Original file (02836-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner’s contract reflect “USN” vice “USNR”.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Koman, Mr. Neuschafer, and Ms. Humphrey, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action implicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01051-07

    Original file (01051-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USN, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Mann, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03216-07

    Original file (03216-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USNR(FTS) vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Mann, and Mr. Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10677-06

    Original file (10677-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner “USNR”, vice “USN”.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUS IONUpon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08938-07

    Original file (08938-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she reenlisted USN vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10159-06

    Original file (10159-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10167-06

    Original file (10167-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10151-06

    Original file (10151-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USN, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Hicks, J., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...