Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01889-06
Original file (01889-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                  DEPARTMENT OFTHE NAVY
                  BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                  2 NAVY ANNEX
                  WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
 Docket No. 1889-06
17 Apr 07




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 07. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1133 Ser N5132/09058 of 12 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

                                                      Sincerely,



                                                              


Enclosure




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
         MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057        

                 IN REPLY REFER TO:
 (                 1133






 MEMORANDLThI FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:    ADVISIRY OPINION

1.       Petitioner has applied to the Board for Correction of Naval Records seeking to have his Navy record be changed to show that he enlisted with a Loan Repayment Program (LRP) guarantee. This memorandum provides a recommendation for the Board regarding the Petitioner’s application.
2.       It is our opinion that the records in this case do not sufficiently corroborate the Petitioner’s claim that the LRP guarantee be awarded. Accordingly, we recommend that the Board deny consideration of the Petitioner’s request. The record indicates that elected an enlistment bonus (EB) o On October 31, 2001, he enlisted in the SECF rating which was not an eligible rating for the Loan Repayment Program in FY02. The Personalized Recruiting for Immediate and Delayed Enlistment (PRIDE) system checks for LRP eligibility. If he had been eligible, the classifier would have been notified an would have been afforded the opportunity
         3.       POC at CNR number is 9322, email        Our mailing address is Commander, Navy R ecru i t i ng Co mmand (N5312), 5722 Integrity Drive (BLDG 784), Millington, TN 38054.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06898-06

    Original file (06898-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1133 Ser N53l2/09054 of 12 Dec 06, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08354-06

    Original file (08354-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTrON OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASH!NGTON DC 2O37U~5lOUMEHDocket No.8354-06 14 Aug 07—‘ ‘This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09961-05

    Original file (09961-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC memorandum 1133 Ser N5312/09049 of 1 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10214-06

    Original file (10214-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N53l2/09063 of 22 Jun 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07063-09

    Original file (07063-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ‘all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerel 4 W. DEAN PE Executive D Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. iN...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04235-08

    Original file (04235-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09026-07

    Original file (09026-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC 1133 Ser N53l2/09056 of 2 Jun 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02023-08

    Original file (02023-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 2023-08 28 Jul 08 Dear

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03647-09

    Original file (03647-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N5312/09047 of 28 May 09, a copy of which is attached. Petitioner has applied to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) seeking to have member’s Navy record changed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06118-07

    Original file (06118-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N5312/09008 of 28 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...