DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 2023-08
28 Jul 08
Dear
Similar Decisions
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09026-07
Original file (09026-07.rtf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC 1133 Ser N53l2/09056 of 2 Jun 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04235-08
Original file (04235-08.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July
2008. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08354-06
Original file (08354-06.rtf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTrON OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX
WASH!NGTON DC 2O37U~5lOUMEHDocket No.8354-06 14 Aug 07—‘ ‘This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10214-06
Original file (10214-06.rtf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N53l2/09063 of 22 Jun 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07063-09
Original file (07063-09.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
‘all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice. Sincerel
4
W. DEAN PE
Executive D
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR. iN...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06898-06
Original file (06898-06.rtf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1133 Ser N53l2/09054 of 12 Dec 06, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06118-07
Original file (06118-07.rtf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N5312/09008 of 28 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03647-09
Original file (03647-09.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser
N5312/09047 of 28 May 09, a copy of which is attached. Petitioner has applied to the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (BCNR) seeking to have member’s Navy record changed.
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02225-09
Original file (02225-09.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July
2009. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N5312/09051 of 28
May 09, a copy of which is attached. W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Dir
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser N5312/09051
28 May 09
MEMORANDUM FOR...
-
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10728-07
Original file (10728-07.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice. It is our opinion that in this case the petitioner has a
misunderstanding as to how the NCF benefit is calculated.