Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01138-06
Original file (01138-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


LCC
Docket No. 1138-06
24 Feb 06

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attach m ents
(2)      CMC memo of 1400/4 MNPR-2 of 1 Feb 06
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisti ng of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and 22 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
                  action.






Docket No. 1138-06
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       Petitioner was promoted to paygrade E-2 effective 2 September 2004.

b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HES S , III
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.




24 February 2006




                                                               W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                               Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00389-06

    Original file (00389-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed to that grade.2. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02007-06

    Original file (02007-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 CWO3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2006 CWO3 Selection Board. They specifically...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00453-06

    Original file (00453-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    453-06 28 FEB 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she did not enroll her spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).2. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00010-06

    Original file (00010-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    10-06 28 FEB 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OFNAVAL RECORD ICO—Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for NEC 5326.2. The reenlistment executed on or about 13 October 2000 is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00628-07

    Original file (00628-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing her failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Chief Warrant Officer 4 (CWO4) Selection Board. By enclosure (2), she added a request to remove her failure of selection by the FY 2006 CWO4 Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03838-06

    Original file (03838-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02171-06

    Original file (02171-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 through 2006 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards and restoring his status as a major in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR). Finally, they noted that officers removed from the 15Th must have one year in an active status before...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01383-06

    Original file (01383-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error an injustice on 22 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01138-99

    Original file (01138-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Whitener, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00568-06

    Original file (00568-06.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No 568-06 9 Feb 06 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced...