Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00803-06
Original file (00803-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                                      CRS
                                                      Docket No: 803-06
                                                                                           1 March 2006




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 February 2002. The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial punishments. The offenses included willful disobedience of a lawful order on two occasions, disrespect on three occasions, and adultery. Consequently your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. When informed of this recommendation, you elected to waive the right to submit a statement in response to the discharge action. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 29 October 2004 you received a general discharge by reason of misconduct. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.







Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.


The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,




W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                           Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09559-05

    Original file (09559-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 2001. After review by the discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05727-07

    Original file (05727-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedy of applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05131-06

    Original file (05131-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 31 August 1999. You were convicted of another...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02348-07

    Original file (02348-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 20 March 2006, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19. Apparently, the separation authority approved...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02348-07

    Original file (02348-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 20 March 2006, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19. Apparently, the separation authority approved...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02999-06

    Original file (02999-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 January 2006. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such action and have not exhausted your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01914-01

    Original file (01914-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04609-01

    Original file (04609-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings -of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01822-01

    Original file (01822-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial The offenses included an unauthorized absence of 18 dicharged with an other than honorable discharge by The names and since you did not ask for such Since you have been treated no differently than reenlistment code when an individual is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00679-99

    Original file (00679-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug At that time you were assigned a abuse on 13 November 1997. reenlistment code of...