Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09061-05
Original file (09061-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 TRG
 Docket No: 9061-05
 28 February 2007




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 10 February 1998 at age 19. On 28 March 1998 your were referred to the recruit mental health unit. Subsequently, you ere diagnosed with a borderline personality
 disorder, which was considered disqualifying for service.
Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative separation. In connection with this processing, you elected to waive your procedural rights. After review, the separation authority directed an entry level separation and you were so separated on 6 April 1998. At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated because of a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when an individual is separated prior to the completion of recruit training. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
         Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08401-06

    Original file (08401-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 6 May 1998 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed dysthymia and conduct disorders. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when a Sailor is separated by reason of erroneous entry due to psychological...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05022-01

    Original file (05022-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. antisocial personality...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-01

    Original file (05913-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your reported history suggested a You were diagnosed with an mala- self- On 25 February 1999 you received a general discharge by reason of the diagnosed personality disorder, reenlistment code. The discharge processing documentation is not and were assigned an RE-4 The Board also noted that the Navy views The Board noted the statement in support of your Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07911-05

    Original file (07911-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 24 July 1997 at age 22. The disorder was disqualifying for service.Based...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09173-05

    Original file (09173-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11232-06

    Original file (11232-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 August 2006 at age 18. You were counseled regarding your condition, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07586-06

    Original file (07586-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 1997 at age 20. Due to your diagnosed personality disorder and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03657-09

    Original file (03657-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material together with all material submitted in naval record, of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and applicable to the proceedings of considered by the Board consisted of your application, procedures this Documentary support thereof, your and policies. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed your commanding officer to issue you a general discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to unsuitability as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00494-06

    Original file (00494-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 1998 at age 18. In the evaluation for the period ending 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08740-01

    Original file (08740-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.