Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06734-05
Original file (06734-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

 2 NAVY ANNEX
 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100         TRG
 Docket No: 6734-05 30 September 2005






4UUUIIEIIUUEIIUFMUh
 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive se~sion, considered your application on 20 September 2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 11 September 1972 at age 20. Following completion of recruit training, you reported for two years of active duty on 27 February 1973. You received nonjudicial punishment On 23 March and 20 April 1973. Your offenses were five periods of unauthorized absence totaling about seven days and attempting to break restriction. On 20 April 1973 you were assigned adverse marks of 1.0 in several evaluation categories.
Based on the foregoing record, you were processed for an administrative discharge. In connection with this processing, you elected to waive the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board. Apparently, it was then decided to discharge you under the provisions of an “early out” program. After review, the discharge authority directed the type of discharge warranted by your service record.
Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and overall trait averages, which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. Your average mark in conduct was 2.3. A minimum average mark of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time
 of your discharge for a fully honorable characterization of service.

In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and desire for a better discharge. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct. The Board concluded that the discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Please be advised that on 27 May 1987 a DD Form 215 was issued to correct the DD Form 214 issued on 10 May 1973. A copy of the DD Form 215 is enclosed for your information.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



 W.       DEAN PF] Executive D
Enclosure
2
CAUTION:         NOT TO BE USED FOR ________ IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES
Ii. ~
2.       DEPARTMENT, COMPONENT AND BRANCH
I WAVY-USNR
 ANY ALTERATIONS IN SHADED AREAS RENDER FORM VOID

 3.       SOCIAL SECURITY NO. (Also,
Service Number if applicable)


I
 CORRECTED TO READ
         SEPARATION DATE ON DD FORM 214 BEING CORRECTED -         10 MAY 73
Ilc. BUPERSINST 1910.22a/BUPERSMAN 3850220 Code 303./CHNAvPERS LTR
F32NKW of 13. MAY 1973
          13a.     Under Honorable Conditions
          13b.     00257N
          17c.     27 FEB 73
 -22a. ( ) 00 02 14
22a. ( ) 00 06 16
          22a.     (        )        00       09       00
          22b.     00 02 14
         26b.     NONE
 ******   ********************************* ** ***** ************** ************
This DD form 215 cancels and supersedes DD form 215 issued on
          24 MAY 73        on 23 AUG 78.
 FICIAL AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
 6.       DATE
B PLNO/J S/ ec
DO 1JUL79 215
 S/N 01 02-LF-000-2 150
 NMPC LIIAISOfl OFFICER. NPRC I
CORRECTION TO DD FORM 214, CERTIFICATE OF RELEASE OR
          DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE DUTY       SERVICE -2
 L~Z~.ZNAL I.JLI r-~.JYcIY~ £14 I~         11I~C~.ICU ITEM NO.
 OF THIS FORM ARE OBSOLETE.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01483-01

    Original file (01483-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    period from 20 December 1958 to 28 January 1965 you were a member of the Marine Corps Reserve and earned about four years and six months of qualifying service for reserve retirement. Therefore, the Board substantially T.he Board also considered whether your record could or should be corrected to show that you are eligible for reserve retirement and retired pay at age 60. retirement, an individual must have 20 years of qualifying service and the last eight years must be in the reserve...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08212-00

    Original file (08212-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. discharge, and...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-141

    Original file (2005-141.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CGPC stated that it has issued the applicant a DD 215, dated November 3, 2005, with the following changes to block 12 of his DD 214: DD 215 ENTRY No change No change No change 04 yrs., 08 mos., 17 days 10 yrs., 1 mo., 14 days No change DD 214 ENTRY 80 05 01 (May 1, 1980) Date Entered AD This Period Separation Date This Period 84 11 08 (Nov. 8, 1984) Net Active Service This Period 04 yrs., 06 mos., 08 days 04 yrs., 10 mos., 14 days Total Prior Active Service Total Prior Inactive Service 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029546

    Original file (20100029546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 28 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029546 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show service credit for all of the time he spent on active duty. Item 22b (Total Active Service) - "0 years, 2 months, and 11 days" c. Item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost) the entries: * 14 May 1969 - 20 May 1969 * 26 May 1969 - 27 June 1969 * 30 July 1969...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04777-08

    Original file (04777-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07620-02

    Original file (07620-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12563 11

    Original file (12563 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, during the period from 11 July to 6 September 1973, you received three more NUPs for a one day period of unauthorized absence (UA),...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01124

    Original file (MD01-01124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 215 Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of cousin's order of service pamphlet PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940216 - 941127 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 941128 Date of Discharge: 951025 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04202-01

    Original file (04202-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03853-12

    Original file (03853-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Characterization of service is based in part on your conduct mark average computed from marks assigned on a periodic basis.