DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 08531-04
17 October 2005
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October
2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were review~d in
accordance with administrative regulations and proce ures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary m terial considered by
the Board consisted of your application, ogether with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and polic es.
After careful and con cientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board fou d that the evidence submitted was insufficient to estab
ish the existence of probable material error or injustice, he Board
was not persuaded that your bilateral hearing los was caused by your
exposure to acoustic trauma during combat perations. It noted that the
Department of Veterans Affairs a tributed the hearing loss to your
history of multiple ear infec ions, chronic mastoiditis, and a radical
mastoidectomy. Accor ingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes o the members of the panel will be furnished upon
reques
It is regretted that he circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
egard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of reg larity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when a plying for a
correction of an official naval record, the bu den is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probabl material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
w.
Executive
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07631-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 15 November 2001 at age 18. You served without incident for over three...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07423-06
You requested that your record be corrected to show, in effect, that you were retired by reason of physical disability on 9 October 2005, rather than released from active duty on that date.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08044-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02402-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support ~ thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 30 June 2005, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. You requested an administrative discharge board (ADB), which voted three to zero in your favor to remain in the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR977 13
*" A three-tiember panel of the Board for Corréction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09817-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 26 October 2005, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN Kxecutive D Bnew lLosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS 720 KENNON ST SE RM 309 (NDRB) WASHINGTON NYD DC 20374-5023 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY October 26,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07177-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11001-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 11001-08 5 October 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2009. Nevertheless, the Board Fouud that these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08555-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...