Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02575-04
Original file (02575-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                     2 NAVY ANNEX
 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


          LCC:lc
                                             Docket No: 2575-04
                                                                                          11 May 2004





This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OPNAV memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3/040315, 30 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350~2O00

 IN REPLY REFER TO
7220
Ser N13OC3/0403l5
30 Apr 04
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Subj:    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
Ref:     (a) SECNAVINST 1900.7G
End:     (1) BCNR Case File #02575-04 w/CD-Rom Service Record
1.       Per your request, the following recommendation concerning enclosure (1) is provided.

2.       Enclosure (1) indicates a request to change his entitlement from “half” to “full” separation pay upon his discharge under honorable conditions on 30 Sep 02.

3.       A review enclosure (1), revealed that the petitioner was discharged from active duty due to weight control failure (SPD code “GCR”) on 30 SEP 02. IAW reference (a), members separated for weight control failure are only entitled to half separation pay.

4.       N13OC recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to change his separation pay from “half” to “full” IAW reference (a).



Assistant Head, Pay and
Allowances Section (N13OC)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02959-04

    Original file (02959-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03124-04

    Original file (03124-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03214-04

    Original file (03214-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04144-03

    Original file (04144-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08935-05

    Original file (08935-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04095-02

    Original file (04095-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Via: Subj: .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 06178-04

    Original file (06178-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNQ memorandum 7220 N130C4/04U0703 dated 30 September 2004, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of the petitioner’s Master Military Pay Account (NMPA) indicates that he had sold back 46 days of leave prior to 28 Apr 00.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00132-04

    Original file (00132-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786

    Original file (NC9808786.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 10006-04

    Original file (10006-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...