Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01354-04
Original file (01354-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
         WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                  LCC:lc
Docket No: 1354-04
11 May 2004



NC1 USN


Dear PETTY OFFICER

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 PERS 40CC, 28 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure



5420
PERS-40CC
APR 28 2004


MEMORANDUM FOR THE       EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:     Assistant for Board for Correction of Naval Records Matters (Pers-OOZCB)

Subj:    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) INQUIRY ICO NC1 , USN,

Issue:   NC1 is requesting that he be authorized retroactive Overseas Tour Extension Incentives (OTEIP) benefits along with Consecutive Overseas Tour (COT) leave travel entitlement for serving back-to-back tours in Panama.

Background:
-        NC1 was assigned to Naval small Craft Instruction Technical Training School (NSCIATTS) RODMAN PANAMA for the period 10 February 1990 through 26 February 1992 followed by another tour of duty at OCEANREP RODMAN PANAMA for the period 30 Mar 1992 through 10 May 1995.
-        NC1 states that he was never counseled regarding his eligibility to OTEIP benefits or COT leave travel entitlement.

Recornmendation:
This office recommends denial of NC1 request as it cannot be determined if he requested an extension which met the eligibility requirements for OTEIP benefits. There is also no way to determine if COT travel entitlement was ever authorized and subsequently used for a period that took place over twelve years ago. Additionally, Title 28, United States Code, section 2401 states action commenced against the United States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues.

Point of Contact:
-        DSN: 882-3550 or Coml: ()
        
Special Assistant
Enlisted Distribution Division

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01583-02

    Original file (01583-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09351-06

    Original file (09351-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s entitlement to Consecutive Overseas Travel (COT) was deferred.2. The Board, consisting of Ivins, Neuschafer, and Ms Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06704-06

    Original file (06704-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment for travel to her Home of Record (HOR) based on her consecutive overseas tour (COT), then to Norfolk, VA her point of embarkation to her new...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05123-03

    Original file (05123-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Direc Enclosure ERS 40CC !h 2 4 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001068

    Original file (20090001068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests Consecutive Overseas Tour (COT) entitlements. He contends that Army Regulation 614-30 indicates that he should be given full tour credit for the 10 of 12 months he served and that he was not voluntarily extended but instead was ordered into retirement and released from active duty and assignment. Evidence of record shows the applicant only completed 10 months of an initial 12 month assignment to Skopje, Macedonia before his retirement date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004225C070205

    Original file (20060004225C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    That office cited the Joint Federal Travel Regulation, Army Regulation 614- 30, and Department of the Army Message dated 26 February 1999 and opined that "serving in a position for two years and then permanent Change of Station (PCS) within the same theater and serving an additional two years for a total of 48 months (In most cases the equivalent of 2 all-others tours) does not meet the parameters of the COT (Consecutive Overseas Tour) Home Travel Program as defined." Eligible dependent is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5166-13

    Original file (NR5166-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    COURTHOUSE RO SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NRO5166-13 12 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to receive Overseas Tour Extension Incentives Program (OTEIP) pay, Option D, fron {? Pursuant to the delegation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060011055C071029

    Original file (AR20060011055C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His orders authorized him COT leave travel entitlements. The Deputy Command for Clinical Services states that the applicant out- processed through many offices and was never briefed on the fact that the COT entitlement would be forfeited if he were to travel through CONUS for more than 10 days. The applicant requested that his PCS orders be corrected to state that his COT travel benefits are still authorized.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR462 14

    Original file (NR462 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was authorized Option °*B” in accordance with Overseas Tour Extension Incentives Program {(OTEIP) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Midboe, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02

    Original file (04056-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.